Nation e-Edition

AS I SEE THINGS - Vulnerable Caribbean economies

AS I SEE THINGS - Vulnerable Caribbean economies

By Brian Francis | Wed, October 24, 2012 - 12:01 AM

ON REFLECTION, it is sometimes extremely difficult to understand the plight of Caribbean economies and the reaction of our governments to the challenges we face.

That difficulty has to do with the perception that history does not seem to matter much as we seek to further the cause of our people and nations. If history matters, why is it then that we seem not to be learning from past experiences, thereby lowering the degree of vulnerability of Caribbean economies? That question is posed against the backdrop of a recent report by Geralyn Edward in the October 13, 2012 edition of the SATURDAY SUN, captioned More Gloom For Region.

The report pointed to several worrisome  developments with respect to regional economies from the perspective of the international monetary fund (IMF).  

These developments included weak balance sheets and reduced external demand for the region’s goods and services, adverse terms of trade, lofty debt, little economic growth, and larger challenges for tourism-dependent economies. Indeed, neither the objective conditions presented by the IMF nor the dire implications for the region are new. Furthermore, the kind of response mechanism we need to appropriately address our plight cannot be a secret since every country in the Caribbean has had to face adversity after adversity over many decades and was forced to come up with creative ways to overcome and survive harsh conditions.

The reality is that from a historical perspective, Caribbean countries have tried export-led growth, import substitution, industrialization, and the more recent outward-oriented development paradigm.  Evidently none of these approaches has guaranteed the sustained growth and development of the region.  It is for this reason that our strategic responses have to be based on a mixture of engagements with the rest of the world as well as broader interactions among ourselves.

If the region continues to rely heavily on trade and investment exchanges with the advanced economies of this world, such as the United States, Canada and European countries, our economic survival will forever be linked to their performance in good and bad times. And that is precisely what we have been witnessing since 2008.

The signal from the IMF is that the projected weak performance of advanced economies spells gloom for the global economy and consequently restricts growth potential in vital areas, such as tourism – the most important sector of Caribbean economies.

In the circumstances, therefore, the most logical response for the region is to look inwards, which means more effort must be made to deepen Caribbean integration via the CSME.

Deepening integration must be manifested in the implementation of sensible policies as opposed to the pronouncement of grand ideas that eventually end up in archives.

As a simple practical example, if the region is interested in tourism, why not invest more heavily in intraregional travel ? The IMF has already hinted that the impact of external tourism on growth is likely to be small in the current global environment, even in the face of increasing arrivals. Given the role that LIAT, for example, has played in regional travel, all Governments should invest adequate levels of funds in that carrier to not only ensure its survival but also try to reduce the cost of travel within the region.

It is time that we get bold and creative in our strategic responses to the challenges we face. This is the only feasible way that we as a people and region can reduce the degree of vulnerability of Caribbean economies.

What say you?  

  • Editor's Choice

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by Carl Ross 2 years ago
Everywhere I look in the Caribbean, governments and economies are in trouble. I think that policymakers thought the recent global crisis was cyclical, when in fact it was structural. This means two things: 1) governments should not count on a strong rebound in tourism anytime soon, even five years after the onset of the crisis; and 2) the appropriate policy response from Caribbean governments should be structural reform. Unfortunately, this might mean "right-sizing" the size of governments to be more in line with the private sectors' ability to pay for them.

  • 1
Posted by nesta marley 2 years ago
in agreement to the need to 'deepen caribbean integratian,via CSME. but how can we,when theres this grandiose conception that we are better than our nieghbours and we profile them as undesirables and hold them under heavy scrutiny when they arrive on our shores? JFK once said if you witnessed racism,predjudice or discrimination and stayed silent about it, you are just as guilty as those who are perpetrating such acts.When our elected officials and those with a position of power and influence refuse to address these acts. we are subjected to be isolated

  • 5

Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest Videos

Quick Poll

Do you agree with the demolition of the 100-year-old chapel at Lazaretto, Black Rock?

View Past Polls

Stay Connected to Your World

Join Your Friends & Our Community

Your Friends' Activity

Daily Cartoons

  • October 31, 2014 - 2014 10 31
  • Thursday, Oct 30, 2014 toon - 2014 10 30
  • October 29, 2014 - 2014 10 29