Nation e-Edition

DLP not responsible for ‘Paro’ ads

DLP not responsible for ‘Paro’ ads

Sun, January 27, 2013 - 4:34 PM

The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) has categorically denied that its President, its General Secretary or any member of its executive or slate of candidates, or its campaign management team is responsible for recent advertisements carried in the local daily newspapers, ostensibly sponsored by a group called PARO.

In dismissing any responsibility for the ads or any semblance of association with the group, the DLP’s General Secretary, George Pilgrim, said he was alarmed and surprised that Opposition Leader, Owen Arthur, could accuse the DLP of sponsoring the ads.

“I challenge Mr. Arthur and the BLP to state the receipt number issued to the DLP from the media house in question, he urged. “They can easily check with the newspaper and ascertain their origin from that publication. Conversely too, Mr. Arthur could tell Barbadians who in his party is responsible for the propaganda on the internet and on the blogs that have been trying to sully the Prime Minister’s good name and those of his cabinet colleagues; albeit unsuccessfully.

In further clearing the air on the matter, the governing party’s General Secretary reiterated that the “DLP has not commissioned nor authorised any such ads; and, therefore, for anyone to associate the DLP with these newspaper postings is not only totally untrue but very misleading, and designed to put the ruling party in a bad light. As a mature, political party, we do not resort to or condone such tactics that have been the hallmark of the Opposition BLP in recent months, he noted.

According to him, “those persons who attribute such to our party are simply revealing a malicious intent that is clearly akin to their own warped and errant machinations.

 

  • Editor's Choice

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by David Brathwaite 1 year, 2 months ago
Yeah, right!

Hiding behind third parties does not alter the nature and purpose of the ads which were in very poor taste.

We cannot allow these developments to slip past our notice. "Anonymous" persons spending thousands of dollars in advertising on behalf of a political party which then claims it has nothing to do with the ads? Preposterous!

This is what they do in American politics all the time, and it is not welcome here.

Likewise, the nature of the venom is new and quite disturbing. I have a real problem with the message being portrayed in any ad depicting the leadership of any political party in this country with bullet holes on the page.

Have learned nothing from Jamaica?

  • 2
Posted by wayne husbands 1 year, 2 months ago
typical and customary tactics of the BLP. guess the nation will be claiming "client confidentiality"

  • 10

Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest Videos

Quick Poll

Do you think the latest attempt to regulate the public service vehicle sector will be successful?

View Past Polls

Stay Connected to Your World

Join Your Friends & Our Community

Your Friends' Activity

Daily Cartoons

  • April 24, 2014 - 2014 04 24
  • Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 2014 04 23
  • Tuesday, April 22, 2014 Cartoon - 2014 04 22