Nation e-Edition

EDITORIAL: No change, but there is hope

EDITORIAL: No change, but there is hope

Wed, October 31, 2012 - 12:00 AM

Next Wednesday, the next president of the United States of America will be known. As the campaigning winds down, the polls are predicting a tight race, and the uncertain turbulence of Hurricane Sandy is adding another unpredictable factor to the race.

Nevertheless, the newspapers have begun to weigh in on their own choice of candidate. This is not an unusual practice in the United States, where freedom of the Press is sacrosanct.

It is not a Barbadian tradition for newspapers to openly support candidates in an election though there is nothing to prevent them. The New York Times last Saturday endorsed President Barack Obama as he seeks another four-year term.

The newspaper said it supports the incumbent Democrat instead of Republican rival Mitt Romney because, among other things, “he has achieved the most sweeping health care reforms since 1965, prevented another Great Depression and ended the war in Iraq”.

On the other hand, the Des Moines Register, the most influential newspaper in the swing state of Iowa, endorsed Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign on Saturday night. It is, however, not clear how persuasive these endorsements are beyond the symbolic.

The Register said voters should give Mitt Romney a “chance to correct the nation’s fiscal course and to implode the partisan gridlock that has shackled Washington and the rest of America”.

It is noteworthy that the Register endorsed Obama four years ago, with his theme of hope and change. It said a different reality has marked his presidency and his record on the economy so far does not suggest he would lead in the direction “the nation must go in the next four years”.

The paper noted that Mr Obama and his administration have been resolute in attacking al-Qaeda’s leadership, including the killing of Osama bin Laden and has ended the war in Iraq although Mr Romney had said he would have insisted on leaving thousands of American troops there.

The tight poll situation may have been as a result of the first debate, where many felt Obama simply failed to show up. Perhaps he also thought that, well ahead in the polls, he did not have to bother to fully engage Romney, who wants to replace him in the White House.

One disappointment of the Obama presidency is the lack of consensus, which was the theme of his defining speech at the Democratic convention in 2004, with its famous line, “There is not a liberal America and a conservative America; there is the United States of America”.

In addition, racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll recently found, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward Blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.

Obama’s dreams from his father were not realized in the four years in the White House, and pragmatism has replaced his hope of change.

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by Leonard B 1 year, 11 months ago
Good editorial, good read, but there is one small point. "Next Wednesday, the next president of the United States of America will be known". This statement is not necessarily true. Depending on how close the results are and the series of events in Ohio, we may not know who the next President is until ten days later. Yes, we may have to wait until November 16th to learn of the winner. Due to limited space I will not get into the details here, but you can research it for yourselves. LB

  • 0

Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest Videos

Quick Poll

Do you think Barbadian women wear too much make-up?

View Past Polls

Stay Connected to Your World

Join Your Friends & Our Community

Your Friends' Activity

Daily Cartoons

  • October 22, 2014 - 2014 10 22
  • Tuesday Oct 21 2014 toon - 2014 10 21
  • October 20, 2014 - 2014 10 20