Mother seeks justice for son

Wed, June 02, 2010 - 1:55 AM

A ST MICHAEL MOTHER is crying out for due process for her son who she said was assaulted by police.

It has been nearly three years since Esther Husbands, of Beckles Road, St Michael, first complained to the Department of Professional Responsibility about alleged police mistreatment of her then 14-year-old son Akeam Warner, but to this day, she said she has not received a satisfactory response.

She recounted her story on Monday during a visit to the NATION’s Fontabelle, St Michael office. On November 11, 2007, he came home from school at the Garrison Secondary around 5 p.m. and said he was going by a friend, but he didn’t come back until 8:15 p.m. when police brought him back,” she said.

Husbands then recounted what her son told her happened. She said the full story did not come out until after the police had left. “He said he went to watch a football game at the Garrison [Savannah] but when he got there the match was over. He said a friend told him the [Physical Education] games teacher’s camera had been stolen but he said it had nothing to do with him and he was going back home as the match was over.

“The teacher had called the police, so when my son was on his way home among a group of boys, the police pulled up in front of them and he was the only one who didn’t run,” she said.Husbands said her son then told her the police threw him in their van and asked him who his friends were but he only knew the nicknames of two of them. It was then he was punched in the chest.

“He told me they drove him ‘all around the place’ before bringing him home around 8:15 p.m. when he told me the police was out there to see me,” she said.

Husbands said it was only after the police left that she noticed her son holding his chest and her daughter told her he said he had been hit.

She then went to Central Police Station the same evening and received paperwork to take to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Injury to child Husbands produced a police medical report dated November 11 that stated Warner had sustained soft tissue damage to the chest from a fist. She also produced documentation dated November 12 from Inspector Trevor Harewood that acknowledged her complaint and stated the matter would be investigated and she would be informed.

However, she said her quest for answers had met with opposition and procrastination. She produced a piece of paper on which she said she had documented every phone call she had made over the past three years and the responses.

She said she was either told the investigating officer, an assistant superintendent Lashley, was on vacation or was told by Lashley he still had to get the officers in question together for a line-up.

The final straw came yesterday when she was informed that assistant superintendent Colvin Greaves from the Department of Professional Responsibility was in charge of the case. When she contacted him, he told her he still had to gather the files pertinent to the case.

“I feel real upset because my son knew nothing, but he was still injured and I am getting the run-around. I want my son to get the line-up they said he would get and I want legal action against the guilty officer,” she said.

When contacted, Greaves would only say he had spoken to Husbands and he was looking into the matter. (CA)

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by Yogi 1 year, 8 months ago: This is ridiculous over three year and still this lady getting no where with this matter. This is a clear reason why the police should not be investigating themselves. The commissioner of Police need to let the public know what is going on with this matter. This is the kind of thing that turn off the public in helping the Police to solve crime. I usually give my support to the RBPF, and I expect much better from them. Yes the police will go overboard sometimes. When it happens and it it brought to light, take responsibility and move on.

I Like
I Dislike

Comment Link

Posted by Double U 1 year, 8 months ago: First thing, the Police should have established this boy’s name and age. Legally they should have gone no further without his parent or guardian present. Next, the thought of a Police lineup administered by Police to identify a Police is absurd at the least and an insult to intelligent people at best. Thirdly, the law allows this child to be entitled to free legal representation, an avenue that Ms Husbands should utilise fully against the Commissioner of Police. Finally Ms Husbands, thank God your son came home in relatively good condition.