Nation e-Edition

Stuart facing election cliff

Stuart facing election cliff Prime Minister Freundel Stuart. (FP)

By Harold Hoyte | Sun, January 13, 2013 - 11:13 AM

All Barbados should be indebted to Prime Minister Freundel Stuart for sparing us a Christmas filled with political jug-jug, partisan stuffing and lots of yard turkeys and lame ducks strutting around our villages and terraces, promising hams and hampers. The holiday period was truly one of quiet calm and soulful introspection, as the holy Christian holiday ought to be.

Although I suspect the Prime Minister’s intentions were more politically self-serving than seeking selflessly to afford the country a peaceful recess to share goodwill among men, he deserves a belated toast of well chilled, home-made Bajan sorrel.

Cheers!

But 2013 has dawned and it portends important political decision-making by the electorate. Stuart now finds himself indebted to country and self to hold the election in the first quarter of this year.

Voters are entitled to the opportunity to exercise their plebiscite to elect a Government following the expiration of the most recent five-year mandate. On that occasion, it was given to his predecessor, David Thompson, of late memory, in 2008 on January 15. This is now a debt whose payment Stuart cannot much longer postpone. He is on the edge of an election cliff.

Having squandered the opportunity to call an election in 2011/2012, or earlier at the time of Thompson’s passing in October 2010, Stuart has eliminated the surprise element from his arsenal, giving all the new candidates, particularly the Opposition Barbados Labour Party’s (BLP) 12 neophytes, ample opportunity to complete their canvassing and boost their fund-raising. Only an Opposition political party in deep slumber would not be ready to engage in battle by this date, the fifth anniversary of the last election.

Two days hence – Tuesday, January 15 – will mark five years since the people of Barbados last went to the polls. It is the first time we are marking a five-year anniversary of an election while the victorious party remains in power without seeking a new endorsement.

What now are Stuart’s narrowed options?

He has the choice of claiming another 28 days or so in Government, serving the full legal term of five years from the first sitting of Parliament on February 12, 2008, after which it will automatically be dissolved. Even then, he need not immediately call an election.

He also has another 90 days thereafter to mid-May during which time he may announce an election date of his choosing.

Stuart would be politically unwise to trespass on that extra time in circumstances where over 60 per cent of people polled by CADRES last September said then it was time to call elections.

There is also the fact that with the two recent credit rating agency downgrades, Government’s options might be constricted and any bitter medicine which might have to be prescribed or administered are better left until after elections.

The members and supporters of the BLP are anxiously calling for an election because they recognize that by procrastinating, Stuart has backed himself into a dark little cul-de-sac. Government has been pushing important late legislation through unusually regular meetings of the House of Assembly and Senate; and during the past week, the last four new constituency offices of Democratic Labour Party (DLP) candidates were opened, one each on Wednesday and Friday instead of the usual celebrated weekend affairs they have been.

That tells me time is drawing nigh, Stuart has run out of weekends and is not contemplating an election too far into that dangerous 90-day stretch after February 12.

Yet, he remains amazingly cool about the scenario, although during two appearances last weekend in St Andrew and St Joseph, he gleefully spoke about impending elections which must surely now be on his mind.

Oh, how I wish I could read that mind of his!

Brings to thought the words of Gordon Lightfoot’s If You Could Read My Mind:

Imagine Freundel Stuart singing to Owen Arthur:

If you could read my mind, love,

What a tale my thoughts could tell.

Just like an old time movie,

’Bout a ghost from a wishing well . . .

But stories always end,

And if you read between the lines,

You’d know that I’m just tryin’ to understand

The feelings that you lack . . . .

You see, Stuart is hemmed in by the legal requirement for Estimates to be laid in Parliament (not approved) – according to Section 108 of the Constitution, which states “The Minister responsible for finance shall, before the end of each financial year, cause to be prepared annual estimates of revenue and expenditure for public services during the financial year, which SHALL BE LAID before the House of Assembly.

This must happen before the start of the new financial year on April 1. There will be no Parliament in existence to approve this important document after February 12.

In order for Stuart to achieve his March 31 target for laying the Estimates, given the fact that Parliament automatically ceases on February 12, means they must be laid within the next four weeks since the House will be unable to meet thereafter except on recall at the instant of the Governor General acting in a state of emergency or war.

The following section of the Constitution makes interesting reading:

61(5) “If, between a dissolution of Parliament and the next ensuing general election of members to the House of Assembly, an emergency arises of such a nature that, in the opinion of the Prime Minister, it is necessary for the two Houses or either of them to be summoned before that general election can be held, the Governor General, acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister, may summon the two Houses of the preceding Parliament, and that Parliament shall thereupon be deemed (except for the purposes of Section 62) not to have been dissolved but shall be deemed (except as aforesaid) to be dissolved on the date on which the polls are held in the next ensuing general election.”

I am not sure the Constitution anticipated our 2013 dilemma in which our Prime Minister is caught between the devil (overdue election date) and the deep blue sea (mandatory laying of Estimates by April 1) as an “emergency”.

It is nigh impossible for Government to finalize, print, circulate, and lay a complete set of Estimates within the next 30 days.

The process of reviewing ministerial budgets has only just begun and this takes at least three weeks of intense meetings at Bay Street with several heads of departments and accounting officers.

The Minister of Finance (or his nominee) is required to meet with all ministries and examine their proposed budgets and adjust them in accordance with Government’s overall ability to meet those expenditures. If this process is rushed, and I would caution against such given our tenuous medium term fiscal targets, it cannot reach Parliament before the end of January since this usually voluminous Estimates document has to be printed and laid.

But it cannot be worth it to circumvent the customary practice of seeking parliamentary debate and approval before April 1.

Assuming it is now not feasible to get this tidily done in a timely manner, Stuart will have to call the general election early enough for a newly elected Parliament to debate and approve the Estimates in the traditional manner by the end of the financial year.

He therefore has to hold elections by the end of the first week of March at the very, very latest.

Given that there is about a 24-day hiatus between the proclamation of the election and election day, Stuart has to be looking at making an announcement within the next week or two, but certainly not later than February 8. He could even do it this week.

That would take campaigning into the period of Valentine’s Day when the colour of red (the colour of the BLP) dominates. And it would give us an election during the season of Lent – again unprecedented in our history. Would the Prime Minister, who was himself a St Philip church pastor in an earlier incarnation, be contemplating this? I wonder. In Grenada, where I believe elections will be announced this week, the Christian Council has warned against having an election campaign during the Lenten Season.

If Stuart ignores this stricture, I suspect we will be going to the polls around March 1.

But he will be aware of the foreboding of idus martiae (the ides of March). Students of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar will know only too well that according to Roman tradition, March 1 is not the ides but the kalends of March.

One thing is sure; Stuart cannot postpone the election kalendas graecas (indefinitely).

Let us all, including an anxious BLP, just wait.

• Harold Hoyte is Editor Emeritus of THE NATION.

  • Editor's Choice

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by En Dee 1 year, 3 months ago
The latest BLP sideshow is nothing but self-serving posturing and should be seen as such by the voting public. Owen and his merry band are so desperate for power that they will pull any stunt to attract attention to their pitiful and disfunctional team. The Stuart Administration is operating well within legal and constitutional boundaries and is obviously very carefully picking the time that is appropriate to them and the people of Barbados. Owen's vainglorious behaviour is not going to influence one iota. One would have hoped, in these tight economic times, for an Opposition team which would carry on the work they are being so well paid to do for and by the people of Barbados. Instead, they will now choose to stay and home and get paid for nothing. How self serving and despicable. Shame on Owen! Nigel D.

  • 59
Posted by CARL HUSBANDS 1 year, 3 months ago
1) If Mr. Stuart can constitutionally call an election after January 15, 2013, then why would the BLP boycott Parliament if it would mean that the DLP can push through even more legislation without any debate? Perhaps Mr. Hoyte should so counsel the BLP machinery.

2) This analysis only serves to reinforce Mr. Stuart as a man of political substance as opposed to the superficiality of the BLP party leaders.

  • 31
Posted by wayne husbands 1 year, 3 months ago
carl...see what and who HAROLD HOYTE is, BY NOW YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE NATION'S POSITION AND MOTIVE IN THE POLITICAL ARENA IN BARBADOS, BUT LIKE FOX NEWS, THEY WILL EAT CROW.

  • 18
Posted by David Brathwaite 1 year, 3 months ago
The question of the election date is not merely legality as the commentators here seem to think. It is a decision with significant political and practical import.

Of prime importance is the approval of the estimates which is the authorization of government spending for the upcoming financial year. The whole process is long and complicated and cannot be done "just so."

The comments here reveal a mindset that the party is more important than the country, which is indeed very sad.

Tennyson Joseph said it very well in last Tuesday's "All A We is One" column:

". . . It would violate the principles of “decency” to commit a country to a revenue and expenditure programme, a few days before a general election, and would indicate scant [dis]regard for the voice of the people.

In addition, such a decision would portray the Prime Minister as one enjoying power with no consideration other than his own satisfaction of sitting in the chair and would diminish his aura."

But you guys will never get it.

  • 1
Posted by wayne husbands 1 year, 3 months ago
A much welcomed "FULL STORY"or should I say commentary? What are the prerequisites to have a full story?what are the motives/expectations of the nation news in bombarding us with this biased piece of trifling op/ed?there are so many stories that the online readers would like to know of,but we are teased with a snippet,this reminds me of the role of a program director at a radio station.he has the responsibility/right to select a playlist.but it is a crime to accept money or gifts from artists to be placed on that playlist.have a conscience nation news.

  • 1
Posted by RANDY BRIDGEMAN 1 year, 3 months ago
'Hoarse', you should've mentioned NBC, CBS, CNN et al to your list of crow-eaters as they all have a political axe to grind, either left or right wing. The veracity of the average story usually lies between the two versions we usually receive from the respective networks.

It's politics as usual, people. There's nothing new under the sun. Each party/supporters desire to make themselves look better than the other in the eyes of voters and truth be damned. One-upmanship I think is the fancy word for it.

The Lord Himself instituted human government to provide security that people may their lives in peace and freedom. Originally, government ministers were to be servants of and not Lords over the people. But we know how that concept has turned out. Gone South if you asked me.

I find the posturing of both parties, the 'peacockism' sickening and pray for the Lord's return soon to visibly demonstrate what a government is all about.

  • 0

Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest Videos

Quick Poll

Do you think the latest attempt to regulate the public service vehicle sector will be successful?

View Past Polls

Stay Connected to Your World

Join Your Friends & Our Community

Your Friends' Activity

Daily Cartoons

  • Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 2014 04 23
  • Tuesday, April 22, 2014 Cartoon - 2014 04 22
  • April 21, 2014 - 2014 04 21