

BY PETER WICKHAM
MANY BARBADIANS might have missed the savage attack on the credibility of University of the West Indies Emeritus Professor Selwyn Ryan that came from Trinidad and Tobago's Prime Minister Patrick Manning last week.
Manning was apparently upset about the most recent poll released by Ryan, which essentially said that Manning and Panday were "locked in a race to the bottom".
For those familiar with political discourse, the potency of Manning's attack on Ryan is sufficient to authenticate his assessment. In this business one normally finds that the most acid attacks are reserved for instances in which the pollster is "spot on", hence Ryan should accept his abuse, safe in the knowledge that if he never got one right before (as Manning has suggested) he certainly has it right now.
Ryan has never sought my support on this matter; nor have I had recent conversations with him; however, I see him as somewhat of a "kindred spirit" and therefore "feel his pain". My intervention is not completely selfless, however, since I have had some experience in the Trinidad and Tobago political market, and I am therefore anxious to comment on this peculiar political environment.
It is a place where an honest pollster often appears less credible than a "snake oil salesman" who assumes that Trinidadians will never change and therefore makes an educated guess at the likely outcome of political contests. This peculiarity emerges largely on account of the race factor that dominates their politics and makes that place (along with Guyana) different from every other Caribbean territory.
Ryan has frequently commented in academic circles about the extent to which race complicates the work of a pollster, and having polled in both Trinidad and Guyana I am anxious to comment on the nature of this complexity. In most Caribbean islands where 45 per cent of people polled expressed the desire for change, there was a change of government. However, in both Guyana and Trinidad, CADRES recorded a desire for change in the vicinity of 70 per cent in pre-election polls and in neither instance was there a change of government.
I have also detected a tendency on the part of Guyanese and Trinidadians to speak openly and freely about their political intentions which reflect their mental state and contradict their racial profile, but they later revert to their traditional behaviour at the last minute.
This complicates the work of a pollster considerably since the vast majority of us move into the field "on instruction" and often have little control over the frequency and intensity of our polls. It is therefore not surprising that a CADRES poll which predicted a ULP victory in St Vincent and the Grenadines in 2000 was still relevant to the outcome twelve months later. In Trinidad, however, a single political event (UNC Mid Centre Meeting) changed the course of an entire election and deemed all polls done by CADRES, SARA and McAl irrelevant to the election that followed.
This brings the most recent Ryan poll into focus since the desperate political picture it paints is obvious to anyone with a modicum of knowledge about Trinidad politics. People there generally have little use for the government, opposition and the individuals who currently lead both entities.
If, however, an election were called tomorrow Manning would win comfortably and similarly, Panday can reasonably expect to triumph over both Bissessar and Maharaj in the UNC's internal election and lead the Opposition as long as he continues to "live, move and have [his] being".
Like Ryan, I am convinced that any reasonable poll there would conclude that people are on the verge of change and consider personalities like Dookeran, Bissessar and Rowley infinitely more capable than the present leadership of both the government and opposition.
Notwithstanding data, intuitive logic and considerable political training, we both know that if an election were called tomorrow none of these individuals would emerge as leaders since Trinidad is a place where political opinion is often unrelated to political action.
In Defence of Ryan : 12/24/2009
Mr. Wickham I am a Trinidadian and I must tell you that you article was spot on. I must add however that we do have our "flash- in-the-pan" moments when our political opinion is aligned to political action and you might be surprised with the outcome of an election in Trinidad and Tobago if the Honourable Prime Minister decides to call one today!!
Amazing : 8/14/2009
It's amazing that Mr. Ramphal is unable to live in his own country of birth and is enjoying the luxury of living in Barbados. Yet has the audacity to talk about ethnic cleansing, something unheard of in the Caribbean. He should be removed from the country.
Ramphal : 8/14/2009
Dont often agree with Wickham but he is on point telling Ramphal where to get off. Ramphal's ethnic cleansing missive was odious in the extreme and a gross insult to every Barbadian. More of us must speak out and condemn Ramphal. Bravo Wickham.
Aiding & Abetting laws : 7/8/2009
@Disgusted Bajan There are already aiding & abetting immigration laws on the books,but I've also never seen the BLP enforce the immigration laws when it came to that.Let's face facts it would be much easier to remove an ILLEGAL alien than prosecuting citizens.
There were never any 30,000 Guyanese here : 7/8/2009
Mr. Wickham makes an excellent point when he says: "Prime Minister Thompson knows that the effective way to end illegal migration here would be to make it a criminal offence to employ, rent property to, or in any other way facilitate an illegal immigrant in Barbados." But why would Mr. Thompson? That would almost certainly disprove the myth that there are 30,000 Guyanese living here illegally and serve as a major embarrassment for the DLP. This "deportation," tough talk by the DLP - was merely a distraction tactic that the most intelligent in our society - spotted from the get go. It was also intended to give the DLP bragging rights that in the worst recession since the 1930,' the DLP was able to keep unemployment down - that is, if Bazans got so desperate that they started picking cotton - in addition to Giant African Snails at $0.50 per pound. This policy was also silly since the economy is in recession and construction is down. People who hired a maid will now do that work for themselve - hence there are no opportunities for Guyanese or no one and poverty will rise. This is where the "inhumane deportation" come in. If you do not understand, read this again!!!
Enablers of Illegal immigrants should be charged : 7/8/2009
It should be a crime to employ, rent property to, or in any other way facilitate an illegal immigrant in Barbados. I would like the Prime Minister to explain why he is not pursuing this route.




No private beaches at Paradise (2/2/2010)ISLAND ON SHOW(2/2/2010)Turtle kill a concern(2/3/2010)Conviction No.198 (2/4/2010)TRACKING SUIT(2/4/2010)Kay's calling (2/5/2010)BL&P sheds light(2/4/2010)In defence of Vincentian citizenship (2/2/2010)Jordan moving on from FirstCaribbean (2/2/2010)
|
|