Crop Over Central   

Transfer them!

Transfer them! Abina Williams testifying at yesterday’s hearing of the commission of inquiry into the Alexandra School industrial dispute. (Picture by Lennox Devonish.)

By Ricky Jordan | Wed, August 08, 2012 - 12:05 AM

Separation is not the best option for Alexandra Secondary School, and teachers who feel uncomfortable working there should seek transfers.

This is the view of young award-winning English teacher Abina Williams who told the commision of inquiry into Alexandra’s industrial dispute that the only thing that might work, besides shock therapy, is for someone to be placed on the compound to ensure the human relations aspect of the Speightstown institution worked.

Speaking on Day 22 of the inquiry at the Gymnasium of the Garfield Sobers Sports Complex yesterday, Williams said a transfer option should be made available to anyone who couldn’t fall in line.

“Those who can’t see themselves in the environment should have taken the option of moving. It may seem easier with one person being separated, but removing the principal is not going to heal that tension . . . I can’t see anyone, including [principal Jeff] Broomes, unifying the staff. There will not be an easy way back,” she said while being questioned all day by attorneys Michael Yarde, Hal Gollop and Vernon Weekes QC, and Cecil McCarthy, QC.

She recalled that so tense was the situation before and after the January strike that sometimes the principal had to literally beg teachers to give him a hearing at staff meetings.

“Staff meetings were tense and stressful, and the principal often needed to ask staff to be silent . . . the older members of staff. They tried to dispute everything he said for the sake of doing so. Their tone was aggressive,” she said, adding that Broomes would at times give up or raise his voice.

“I dreaded going into those meetings,” Williams told the commission, chaired by retired judge Frederick Waterman.

She also recalled deputy principal Beverley Lashley’s behaviour at those staff meetings, noting that even though Lashley sat beside the principal who chaired the meeting, her facial expressions “said a lot”.

Throughout some meetings, Williams said, Lashley would push up her lips, roll her eyes and very rarely contribute.

“I don’t know why she does it,” said Williams, further recalling one instance after the January strike “when a note was being passed around for everyone to laugh at”.

“I remember her cackling and saying she couldn’t believe Broomes had set this up,” Williams added, describing the deputy as “emotionless” and lacking in warmth.

Citing other instances of disrespect toward the principal, Williams said there was a habit of teachers making fun of things which Broomes placed on the notice board, including one related to the Easter academy under which someone wrote in red ink “bare junk”.

Williams, who has been at Alexandra for six years, opined that the school was filled with potential and could be one of the best in the educational system under Broomes, but some teachers, particular old scholars who had been teaching there for decades, didn’t share that view.  

She said they not only resisted change but tended to compare Broomes with previous principals, thereby filling the environment with “too much negative energy for Alexandra to move forward positively”.

Stating that tradition was important, the young teacher argued there could be too much tradition and there was therefore a need to bring fresh ideas. She also dismissed the view that Broomes had tried to make Alexandra “a one-man show”. 

  • Editor's Choice

Share your thoughts

Please sign in or register to post your comments.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Posted by Tony Webster 9 months, 2 weeks ago
I always thought that the idea of having Boards of Management was an excellent one, given the huge number of our schools: to allow a closer relationship and overview of the day to-day activities of each institution, and yet preserving good governamce and discipline as well. Why am I now reminded of the Eastern view of "preserving the peace", by "Seeing no evil; hearing no evil; and speaking no evil?". There is no shortage of warts all over the face of our educational system, but I fear that one is a weak link bewteen the Ministry and their need to monitor the Boards. Delegation does not remove ultimate responsibility from the Delagator.
  • 2
Posted by Andy Lovell 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Finally someone here is making sense. Too many backward old school teachers. The school does need new ideas and like the lady said, Broome leaving is not going to solve the problems of the school. It might seem like the easy way out but it could turn out to be the worst thing that could happen to the kids who is the school and the building.
  • 9
Posted by cold winter 9 months, 2 weeks ago
I agree 120% with Abina Williams, the transfer option is a very good idea. Mr. Broomes may God continue to be with you , keep trusting him, I hope the government get a broom and sweep all those bullies out. Yvonne
  • 10
Posted by SANDREA BUTCHER 9 months, 2 weeks ago
After reading the comment posted, I have to wonder if some of these readers are serious. First, they should read the Education act to find out what the Board of Management is 'supposed' to do. Second they should find out what the Heads of Departments are 'supposed' to do. Then they should interview a Librarian at some secondary schools to see what they are supposed to do.
With all of that said, the 'older teachers' as they are being called, have training, have experience, mark examinations and have a wealth of knowledge. If it is that you are not being allowed to do your job it is obvious that you will be hostile towards the object who is preventing you from doing your job.
About the teachers who are old scholars, they would know about the school culture. Every school has a culture, whether it be a Harrison College, Ellerslie or Alexandra. The culture is passed on by the 'older teachers' and the old scholars as well. Culture is important in any organisation, whether it be one of excellence, family or indomitable spirit.
  • 1
Posted by Leonard B 9 months, 2 weeks ago
I can just imagine the nerve that was required for Abina Williams to "go against the flow" and to tell the truth, as she saw it. It would have been much easier for her to simply agree with the other teachers. I believe every word that she said. Unfortunately many have called for the removal of Broomes and the committee may be swayed by numbers. However, I hope that they bear in mind that a new principal will be faced with the same challenges from an inflexible staff complement and a board which seems bent on compliance with them. The more that I hear the more I would be inclined to distribute existing teachers among other schools, change the board, and continue with new teachers and Broomes under new guidelines and Ministry oversight. LB.
  • 1

Page 1 of 1 pages

Recent Comments

Latest Videos

Quick Poll

What is your take on Owen Arthur bowing out of elective politics? Is he going at the right time, too soon, or should he have bowed out before?

View Past Polls

Stay Connected to Your World

Join Your Friends & Our Community

Your Friends' Activity

Daily Cartoons

  • May 23, 2013 - 2013 05 23
  • May 22, 2013 - 2013 05 22
  • May 21 2013 - 2013 05 21