• Today
    October 16

  • 08:07 PM

Laws concerning guards need updating

RYAN H. DRAKES,

Added 14 June 2015

letterpen423x6304

I have been a security guard for the past 20 years and, after such a considerable length of time, I think that I should be able to speak with some knowledge of this field.

Though I agree that a “Use of Force” policy is necessary for all security agencies and firms, there are a few other issues that should be addressed as well.

First of all, there is legislation which governs and outlines the powers granted any security guard licensed under the Private Investigator And Security Guard Act.

This piece of legislation, for the most part, has not been amended since its inception. This is shocking as we observe, even here in Barbados, the level of certain types of crime. Those that involve firearms especially are on the increase.

Any “Use of Force” policy should be approved by the private investigator and security guard board before being implemented as part of any security guard’s duties and responsibilities.

In fact, the other considerations that should come into focus are consultation with the union of which security guards may be members and also the Safety And Health At Work Act, which may come into question as well. Legislation has obviously not kept pace with the growing need for security in Barbados.

There are some security agencies in Barbados that have great difficulty in acquiring firearm licences for their security guards to perform cash in transit  duties. So some agencies have resorted to hiring individuals who already possess firearm licences as citizens of Barbados. 

There must be cause for concern if, in an event of a lethal force encounter, a security guard uses his firearm licensed to him as a citizen to enforce the company’s “Use of Force” policy.

No security officer should have to apply for a firearm licence as an ordinary citizen would. The Private Investigator and Security Guard Board should be making this application to the Commissioner of Police on behalf of any security agency that has a working “Use of Force” policy approved by it and whose officers can meet the requirements in terms of health and proficiency under the Firearms Act.

– RYAN H. DRAKES

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Dos and Donts


Welcome to our discussion forum here on nationnews.com. We encourage lively debate, but we also urge you to take note of the following:

  • Stay on topic – This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.
  • Be respectful – Meeting differences of opinion with civil discussion encourages multiple perspectives and a positive commenting environment.
  • Do not type in capitals – In addition to being considered “shouting” it is also difficult to read.
  • All comments will be moderated – Given the volume of comments each day, this may take some time. So please be patient.
  • We reserve the right to remove comments – Comments that we find to be abusive, spam, libellous, hateful, off-topic or harassing may be removed.
  • Reproduction of comments – Some of your comments may be reproduced on the website or in our daily newspapers. We will use the handle, not your email address.
  • Do not advertise – Please contact our Advertising Department.
  • Contact our Online Editor if you have questions or concerns.
  • Read our full Commenting Policy and Terms of Use.
comments powered by Disqus

POLL

Do you agree with the Barbados Licensing Authority’s decision to repeal the decision to require motorist to provide proof of address in order to renew their licenses or register new vehicles?

Yes
No

FRONT COVER OF TODAY'S NEWSPAPER

CARTOON

INSTAGRAM