• Today
    April 26

  • 09:02 AM

Wait worth it for Husbands


Added 25 May 2018


Sandra Husbands, who won the St James South seat at Queen's College School where the results were announced. (Picture by Nathan Husbands.)

After an eventful 2018 election night in the St James South constituency, and more than six and a half hours of vote-counting, Sandra Husbands of the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) was declared winner at minutes to six yesterday morning.

She defeated Donville Inniss of the Democratic Labour Party (DLP), who held the seat for two consecutive terms.

Returning officer Charles Phillips announced at 5:57 a.m. that Husbands had secured 4 012 votes to the 1 674 won by Inniss.

Neither Husbands nor Inniss was present at the Queen’s College counting centre for the announcement. Husbands had passed through around 1:58 a.m.

Of the other candidates, Jacqueline Alleyne of Solutions Barbados gained 103 votes and Christal Austin of the United Progressive Party (UPP) 101. No results were announced for the Independent, Nicole Howell. There were 18 rejected ballots.

Vote-counting began at 10:46 p.m. – nearly two hours after the scheduled start. The delay pertained to the polling stations at West Terrace Primary School and the Caribbean Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology. It resulted after electoral officials acted on a court order issued on Election Day that delayed the closing of some ballot boxes across the island to allow 18 Commonwealth citizens to vote.

Phillips said the order “necessitate(ed) the halting until we saw the amended list…the voters were there before the polls closed at 6 o’clock so they had every entitlement to go through the process.”

The polls at West Terrace School finally closed at 8:15 p.m.

There was yet another hold-up, as a box containing the ballots from the early voting on May 17 had yet to be delivered. The box was brought to the station at 10:15 p.m. in a Government vehicle accompanied by a police van with beacons flashing.

Phillips also disclosed that there “was a challenge with the reporting” involving a new AMS system being used for the counting process. He said the new system would not accept results “unless it balances throughout the whole system”.

The electoral officials wanted to ensure that accurate results were being released, because “for some reason information was getting to the airwaves”. This was in response to complaints that results from that constituency were being leaked to radio stations before the official announcement from the returning officer. (MH)


Dos and Donts

Welcome to our discussion forum here on nationnews.com. We encourage lively debate, but we also urge you to take note of the following:

  • Stay on topic – This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.
  • Be respectful – Meeting differences of opinion with civil discussion encourages multiple perspectives and a positive commenting environment.
  • Do not type in capitals – In addition to being considered “shouting” it is also difficult to read.
  • All comments will be moderated – Given the volume of comments each day, this may take some time. So please be patient.
  • We reserve the right to remove comments – Comments that we find to be abusive, spam, libellous, hateful, off-topic or harassing may be removed.
  • Reproduction of comments – Some of your comments may be reproduced on the website or in our daily newspapers. We will use the handle, not your email address.
  • Do not advertise – Please contact our Advertising Department.
  • Contact our Online Editor if you have questions or concerns.
  • Read our full Commenting Policy and Terms of Use.
comments powered by Disqus


Did you expect more guns to be turned in during the amnesty?