• Today
    July 18

  • 04:11 PM

NUPW majority agree on increases

RACHELLE AGARD, rachelleagard@nationnews.com

Added 07 June 2018


NUPW president Akanni McDowall (second right) in conversation with (from left) Carol Rice, Tony Hoyte and Roy Brathwaite following a meeting at NUPW headquarters. (Picture by Lennox Devonish.)

The majority of members of the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) have agreed to proposed salary increases for civil servants, says union president Akanni McDowall.

This decision came yesterday following an hour-long meeting at the NUPW’s headquarters, Dalkeith, St Michael.

“We met with the general membership and once we were able to explain the proposal to them, they agreed with the position that was taken by the council; the majority did. There were very few people who did not agree,” he said.

While voices were raised during the closed-door meeting in the Horatio Cooke Auditorium, those who emerged afterwards said they were relatively satisfied with the discussion.

McDowall added that the proposals were sent to the Ministry of the Civil Service and the union was awaiting a response from them.

“Once we have a response from them, then we would communicate with the public accordingly,” he said.

When pressed for the suggested timeline on the matter, he said the ministry would be the ones to give the union the proposed deadline.

Previously the NUPW had not swayed from its position of a 23 per cent increase in negotiations with the former Democratic Labour Party Government. However, new figures of between 3 and 4.5 per cent were being suggested since the Barbados Labour Party took office following the May 24 General Election.

McDowall declined to reveal the proposed increase, but said the proposal was multifaceted and held different components.

“I can’t reveal anything further; not until we finish negotiations,” he said.

Meanwhile, president of the Unity Workers Union and newly appointed Opposition Senator Caswell Franklyn had earlier criticised the move by the NUPW hierarchy as “political mischief”, since after one meeting the bodies had reached agreement.

Describing the unfolding of the situation as shameful, Franklyn said the members should “do something about them [union leaders] because they were trying to hold the last administration up to ransom”.

“[They] were asking for 23 per cent, which was really unrealistic, and then with one meeting they dropped from 23 per cent down there? It smacks of political mischief,” he said, adding that the union’s holding out was an indication that it wanted to get rid of the last Government.

“I would have wanted them [the previous Government] out, but I would take no steps through my union to do it; that is not what the union is for,” Franklyn said. (RA)


Dos and Donts

Welcome to our discussion forum here on nationnews.com. We encourage lively debate, but we also urge you to take note of the following:

  • Stay on topic – This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.
  • Be respectful – Meeting differences of opinion with civil discussion encourages multiple perspectives and a positive commenting environment.
  • Do not type in capitals – In addition to being considered “shouting” it is also difficult to read.
  • All comments will be moderated – Given the volume of comments each day, this may take some time. So please be patient.
  • We reserve the right to remove comments – Comments that we find to be abusive, spam, libellous, hateful, off-topic or harassing may be removed.
  • Reproduction of comments – Some of your comments may be reproduced on the website or in our daily newspapers. We will use the handle, not your email address.
  • Do not advertise – Please contact our Advertising Department.
  • Contact our Online Editor if you have questions or concerns.
  • Read our full Commenting Policy and Terms of Use.
comments powered by Disqus


Do you think the schools starting earlier in the new school term will help with traffic management?