• Today
    April 20

  • 04:37 AM

EU to abolish sugar quotas

sherieholder, sherieholder@nationnews.com

Added 28 June 2013


BRUSSELS, Jun 28, CMC – African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries say they are “appalled” by the decision reached by the European Union (EU) institutions earlier this week to abolish EU beet and isoglucose sugar quotas in 2017. “Once again, the concerns and expectations of the ACP have not been taken into account in spite of their numerous submissions over the past years,” the ACP said in a statement. Earlier this week, the ACP sugar producing states that include the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) countries of Barbados, Belize, Guyana, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago, warned EU Council of market instability and the acute risk to their developing economies if the proposal to abolish EU sugar quotas in 2015, rather than 2020. In their latest statement, the ACP group said it has “regularly and consistently warned the European Union of the damage that early abolition of beet and isoglucose quotas would cause to their economies. “This was seen to contradict and undermine the objectives of the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) which many of the ACP sugar exporters had entered into or are in the process of finalizing the negotiations with the EU.” The ACP said that the European Commission own impact study forecast that prices would decrease by nearly 45 per cent when compared to 2012 market prices. “We signalled that such a situation with the attendant volatility would introduce major uncertainties for ACP suppliers. Market price fluctuations will also be determined by exogenous factors such as exchange rates. “ At this forecast price level, many of our sugar industries may be unable to survive.  The analyses of independent consultants and academic researchers supported these devastating predictions if the Commission’s proposal for EU’s 2015 abolition of beet quotas sugar is adopted.” The  ACP said it had also drew the attention of EU decision makers to the December 2012 report by the European Commission Services entitled “Prospects for Agricultural Markets and Income in the EU 2012-2022” which that the expiry of sugar quotas would lead to a reduction of the domestic sugar price in the EU. “Imports, including preferential access, would be less attractive and the EU would move close to self-sufficiency and may even become a net exporter from time to time. The ACP warned that when CXL imports are factored in, the inescapable conclusion was that ACP sugar exports would drop to a negligible fraction of what they are today, or be wiped out altogether of the EU market.” But the ACP said that in spite of this empirically-based forecast of immense damage to ACP sugar industries and, more widely, to ACP economies, the EU decision makers have agreed to put an end to sugar quotas in 2017, earlier than the proposal of 2020 made by the European Parliament. “This decision calls into question the coherence of EU policies and seriously undermines the very basis of the long longstanding trade and development cooperation partnership between the ACP and the EU. “The ACP firmly believes that this time lag will be too short to implement measures to improve the competitiveness of their respective industries and allow them to operate successfully in such a liberalized market.   “This will also negate the gains made so far from investments made through the EU-funded Accompanying Measures Support Programme and own scarce resources in some cases.” The ACP said that in line with the objectives contained in the Cotonou Agreement and the Economic Partnership Agreements, it was calling on the EU to review the situation in 2018 “and to come up with appropriate corrective measures to enable its small and vulnerable trading partners to continue with their economic development and integrate into the world economy”.  


Dos and Donts

Welcome to our discussion forum here on nationnews.com. We encourage lively debate, but we also urge you to take note of the following:

  • Stay on topic – This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.
  • Be respectful – Meeting differences of opinion with civil discussion encourages multiple perspectives and a positive commenting environment.
  • Do not type in capitals – In addition to being considered “shouting” it is also difficult to read.
  • All comments will be moderated – Given the volume of comments each day, this may take some time. So please be patient.
  • We reserve the right to remove comments – Comments that we find to be abusive, spam, libellous, hateful, off-topic or harassing may be removed.
  • Reproduction of comments – Some of your comments may be reproduced on the website or in our daily newspapers. We will use the handle, not your email address.
  • Do not advertise – Please contact our Advertising Department.
  • Contact our Online Editor if you have questions or concerns.
  • Read our full Commenting Policy and Terms of Use.
comments powered by Disqus




Do you think it should be mandatory for children to get religious instruction?