Last Updated: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 : 5:59 AM
Member Name:
Password:



Home / Commentary _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Commentary
Tools: Print  |  E-mail  |   Bookmark and Share
Unsound systems an insult to public

 

Published on: 11/4/2009.


ANY EVENT that is associated with the celebration of our Independence will have a special place in my heart.

Indeed, for those of us who were privileged to have witnessed that auspicious occasion on November 30, 1966, Barbados' attainment of nationhood will forever remain etched in our minds.

Experience is a great teacher. In 1966, as part of our national celebrations, that famous quartet the Supremes was invited to Barbados to perform and that event was marred by an ugly incident resulting in a semi-riot in Independence Square.

The reason? people just could not hear because of a faulty public address system.

I do not wish to be with any of my children or grandchildren and be a witness to or victim of such an incident again.

That is why, when I attended the Sagicor Life Lighting Ceremony in National Heroes Square last Sunday night, along with the many thousands who were present, I was far from pleased with the quality of sound that came out of the public address system, particularly during the opening speeches. From my standpoint, no attempt was made to correct the fault.

This resulted in several painful cries of protest, quiet though they were, from those who were standing in my area. Now convinced that my hearing was not defective, I approached the technicians and indicated to them that some people could not hear.

One pointed "to whom it may concern". I spoke to the individual, who in turn allowed me to know that the people in front [under the tent] could hear.

Am I to get the impression that the ceremony was for the invited guests only? I am sure that was not the intention of the organisers or sponsors.

Now, I wish to make this clear, and with apologies to no one. Public events are just that, and those who are hired by the Government of Barbados and receive taxpayers' money must understand that they have a responsibility and must be held accountable when blunders and bleeps of this nature occur.

Be that as it may, the performances were quite good by those who appeared on the card, and to my mind, patrons would have left quite satisfied in the end. But it does not alter the fact that mal-functioning equipment have no place at public events - certainly not at Independence celebrations.

This writer just will not stand for it!

- REGINALD HUNTE

Subject:
Body:
Poster:
captcha 81591c06e1bd4da5833666bbbe1b40a9
Enter text seen above:
1 comment found!

TECHNIC HICCUPS : 11/4/2009
You got that one right.The ceremony is for the SPONSORS, the pretentious AMBASSADORS,PARLIAMENTARIANS and other specially invited guests.I say pretentious Ambassadors because after the SHOW at the Gymnasium, they do not come back to the committees and do not follow through with the work which they started. It's only for the night and to be able to put that criteia on their CV. PARISH AMBASSADOR. We have complained for years about such treatment and just bringing back the same artistes year after year and it's getting boring. It's time for a new vision in the programme. The technical persons are the same ones who wok with the same company at all the events in Barbados and I find that a spirit of don't carishness (in Bajan terms) have crept into their jobs.It was even displayed at NIFCA this year. This too is a monoploly which needs to be addressed. I'm glad somenone else has the nerve to speak out.

Earphones

More Commentary News


TODAY'S CARTOONS
3/15/2010



Most Emailed Stories

Do you think UWI should reduce its intake of students?

Yes
No
Uncertain

 









© 1997-2007. Nation Publishing Company Limited. | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use
News | Comments | Lifestyle | Media | E-Paper& Archives | Subscriptions | Advertising | Classifieds | Blogs