

"I TRULY BELIEVE where I'm heading is stardom."
That was how the DAILY NATION interview ended in August with the then unknown graffiti artist behind the Off-Da-Brink scribblings.
Yesterday, his "stardom" was put on hold, as the only place the graffiti artist was headed was back to prison.
Azariah Nathaniel Phipps, 53, yesterday officially confessed to being the one behind the mysterious markings that started to appear in July. Off-Da-Brink had been painted on walls, buildings, garbage cans, even on the sidewalk in front of Cave Shepherd.
The deportee, who has no fixed place of abode, opted to change his plea and admitted "to the perpetuation of the crime" that between July 10 and 31, he defaced the St Augustine Building by placing the markings Off-Da-Brink on it without the consent of the occupier.
"It was an innocent literary attempt to kinda emphasise the fact that I want to 'big-up' my Barbados hub," Phipps told Acting Magistrate Laurie-Ann Smith-Bovell.
"I wanted to 'big-up' myself and my mother," he added.
"But if you wanted to do that, just take out an ad in the newspaper," Acting Magistrate Smith-Bovell told him.
"But THE NATION newspapers, they actually propaganderise my position and they turned the public against me," Phipps claimed.
"They said I was better than Michael Jackson."
Reiterating that Off-Da-Brink was about lifting himself and his mother, Phipps continued: "It's not that I hurt anybody. I could have cleaned it up myself.
"And what happened is I was pushed, so when I came out of prison I pushed a rap band. That's what I wanted to do," he said.
Phipps further explained he had decided to plead guilty so he would not have the offence hanging over his head.
In addition, he admitted he had an outstanding $1 200 fine, only part of which he had paid.
"I need some time to think about this," said Acting Magistrate Smith-Bovell.
In the end, she remanded Phipps to HMP Dodds until December 3 pending sentencing.
Prosecutor Station Sergeant Irvin Kellman, who outlined the facts, said the St Augustine Building was on Lower Bay Street.
Phipps went with a can of spray paint and painted the markings on the wall of the building without the permission of the owner. The owner was not pleased.
Police investigated and eventually interviewed Phipps.
He admitted painting the graffiti, saying it represented "the name of the man and the purpose".
The prosecutor further told the court Phipps admitted to police he was the man.
let him go free! : 11/6/2009
let him be free to clean up the graffiti markings, this man is 53 and old enough to know better. don't send him to Dodd's where he will just be sitting around and eating for free, make him work.
Greater reform : 11/6/2009
Jail should be a last resort for an offense such as this - why not make better use of tax payers money and let him clean graffiti from all buildings, public and private over a period of time (community service) - 1: He gets somethig to keep his idle hands employed; 2: save tax payers some money 3: a lesson in the value of community and the property of others - much better than jail where he will (sadly) most likely acquire more sophisticated criminal skills. Jail is not the answer for every crime committed. Advocate for greater reform vs imprisonment.
: 11/6/2009
Too old to be so dumb.
: 11/6/2009
man why waste the prison time wid he, mek he clean up the entire bim from all a dese foolish markings bout d place. I just gotta pay more taxes ta feed he for defacing bim. I agree wid d bajan against dumping, he get lock up and the others get to clean up. Makes me wonder how effective is the policy?
no real crime : 11/6/2009
He's being punished more than those illegal dumpers who were caught red-handed ....now that's off-da-brink!!
: 11/6/2009
If he wanted to big up himself and his mother, he should have painted it on their home for everyone to pass and view. He seems to need help - no fixed place of abode,unpaid fine (no money to pay the fine, but can buy the paint.)
Off-Da-Streets : 11/6/2009
What purpose does it serve to keep this man in jail? His offence is harmless, In the sense no one was robbed,beaten,or molested. However defacing other people property is a act that can be handled by making the perpetrator clean up his mess out of his pocket,To the owner satisfaction,forthwith of course.
: 11/6/2009
He went off the brink....




'Young boy' full of love (11/13/2009)Report: Barbados least corrupt in region (11/18/2009)Pop star flies in family (11/13/2009)$600m resort hits snag(11/13/2009)Experts: Don't cut bonuses(11/19/2009)Tortured teen back home(11/15/2009)Angel in The City(11/15/2009)NOT ALL GLOOM(11/17/2009)BBC to launch FM station in Barbados (11/18/2009)
|
|