Full text of 2013 Budget
THE FOLLOWING IS THE 2013 Financial Statement and Budgetary Proposals presented by Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler today at 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker Sir, As I rise to present this Financial Statement and Budgetary Proposals, the central feature of which will be a revised growth and fiscal adjustment strategy for Barbados, I am reminded of the biblical injunction to be found in the book of Ecclesiastes at chapter 3 which states:
“to everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;
A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;
A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance;
A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;
A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away;
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.”
I call this verse to mind Sir, because I genuinely believe that it succinctly captures the critical juncture at which all of us as Barbadians have arrived on our journey for social, economic, cultural and indeed political development. It is a juncture in time Sir, that presents this country with a real opportunity to choose a path of restructuring and revitalisation not just to the obvious systems that drive our economy and society, but importantly as well, to the core beliefs, values and philosophical moorings that characterise who we are as a people, what quality of life we want and imprint what we desire to leave on history’s page.
The exercise we undertake over the next few days and certainly in the weeks ahead cannot be pigeon-holed into a narrow discourse, over only the merits or demerits of this measure or that measure; or about who was right and who was wrong. It certainly, Sir, should not be about who wants which party in office and any naked anti-democratic reactionary hot air about regime change through bluster rather than ballot.
Rather Sir, it has to be a critical national conversation about how we maintain Barbados’ standing as a leading developing country in the world and more importantly how we build on what we already have in an effort to surpass even our most generous expectations. It has to be a national dialogue characterized not by fear and fear-mongering, but based on a platform of optimism that starts from the belief that our best days are ahead of us simply because we are starting from a position of relative strength.
We have experience and we have knowledge; we have accomplishments and importantly as well Sir, we know what we can achieve still if we work collectively as a people – black, white or Indian, worker or management, public or private, Bee or Dee. This exercise Sir must be about how we can be build the national fortitude and insatiable desire to undertake the kind of change which can extend our possibilities beyond mere hopes and toward crafting of a firm and credible pathway to developing a country that is socially balanced, economically sound, environmentally sustainable and characterized by good governance.
This, fellow Barbadians, is our season to take stock. It is our season to pursue a rigorous examination of self, of communities, of systems, and of country as a whole. It is our season for frank, honest, constructive and productive engagement among ourselves and with the rest of the world.
My sincere hope Sir, is that in the course of my presentation here this evening, I can convey that sense of openness, and seriousness of purpose even as I set the stage for what will be a call on all Barbadians to forge a collective movement to stabilize our economy and usher in a more determined agenda for structural change that will better equip us to confront the challenges or a modern world.
To this extent Sir, attractive as it might appear, ours is not a mission today to entertain ourselves with the instantaneous but never-lasting gratification of retail politics. Ours is a mission to present frankly and fairly the facts pertaining to the current state of the Barbados economy, in particular the state of the public finances and the impact which this is having on efforts to forge a return to sustainable economic growth in our economy.
More pointedly Sir, our mission is to set out not just how we propose to deal with these issues but more importantly how we intend in the short- to medium-term to engage in an intense process of intervention by the State over the next two years to unlock the factors which can secure us the growth we so clearly need to sustain ourselves.
In this regard Sir permit me to say that we in this administration begin this part of the discourse by saying to all Barbadians that our macro-economic programme has gone off-track and needs to be brought back into line with what we believe is consistent with the objectives required for economic sustainability characterized by growing international reserves, exchange rate stability, sustainable and balanced economic growth and adequate yet affordable social services provision.
However, before we can get to those specific interventions it behoves me to set the context within which we are operating and what has led us to this need for a serious course correction in our short to medium-term economic management strategy.
The Global Crisis and Its Impact on Barbados Economy:
Mr Speaker, regardless of whatever one may wish to believe, the genesis of our current economic problems have a direct link to the very unfavourable international economic environment which this country and several others like it across the world have had to face since 2007. Indeed Sir, picture if you will the scenario with respect to Barbados’ macroeconomic performance in the post-2007 period.
After growing consistently by an average of about 3.0 per cent per year between 2002 and 2007 when the global economy was booming and international demand for our goods and services were outstripped only by the robust foreign direct investment flows into the country, our economy stalled in 2008 at the very beginning of a then unfolding international financial and economic crisis: A crisis which is now accepted to be the worst any Barbados government has had to deal with in near one hundred years.
By 2009, with the evolving crisis hitting hard on our key trading partners (the US, Canada, Britain and the Caribbean) this translated into the largest real economic contraction in Barbados since 1992 – the period of the last major economic crisis. The economy declined by 4.5% with our fiscal deficit reaching near 10% at the end of fiscal year 2009/10. To put the decline in perspective: despite some “green shoots” in 2010 and 2011, the unanticipated depth and duration of the current global recession has meant that, on average, real economic activity has fallen by 1 per cent every year since 2008.
The traded sectors in particular have borne the brunt of the impact, as a decline in global GDP, depressed credit markets and elevated levels of unemployment in our trading partners significantly reduced demand for domestically produced goods & services.
Tourism, which is known to be our most vital industry, but which itself was already beginning to show signs of wear prior to the crisis, has been hard hit. Long-stay arrivals fell almost 9 per cent in 2009, the largest decline recorded in over two decades. And despite a strong intervention from government to help property owners weather the storm and pump more money into marketing, the resultant improvements in 2010 and 2011 were soon dissipated as reduced airlift capacity in major source markets and the loss of Almond Resort and a number of other smaller hotels, contributed to a 5.5 per cent decline in 2012.
Overall, by the end of last year, long-stay arrivals remained 7.0 per cent below the levels recorded in 2007. This situation has been exacerbated by the fact that those who choose to vacation in Barbados are now spending much less than in previous years. In fact, since 2008 average visitor spending fell for 5 consecutive years, equivalent to almost $300 million in losses per year. This is despite an improvement in average length of stay during the same period.
The depressed economic conditions also filtered through to other critical sectors especially international business and financial services which lost considerable value between 2008 and 2010 and has not regained sufficient ground to allow it to come anywhere close to its pre-crisis levels of contribution to the Barbados economy.
While manufacturing and agriculture both had significant output challenges even prior to the onset of the crisis, these were only multiplied because of it. Manufacturing output decreased by 12.2 per cent in 2009, significantly higher than the 0.7 per cent and 1.2 per cent decline in 2006 and 2007, respectively. While the impact on the agricultural sector was less severe and driven by other domestic conditions, agricultural output nevertheless fell by just above 5 per cent during the last two years.
The knock-on effects of a slowdown in tourism-related activity were observed in the non-traded sector, which declined by 4.1 per cent in 2009 for the first time since 2001 and currently remains below 2008 levels. Waning investor confidence, increased levels of uncertainty in international credit markets and reduced tourism activity resulted in the postponement of several real-estate development projects.
Consequently, the construction industry , which had seen an incredible 15 years of growth, fell 5.6 per cent in 2008 and plummeted by 18.2 per cent in 2009. Inevitably, mining and quarrying also suffered their greatest declines, plunging by as much as 37.0 per cent in 2009 and by a further 13.6 per cent and 8.0 per cent in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Wholesale & retail; business & other services; transport, storage & communications all dipped in 2009 by 5.0 per cent, 3.0 per cent and 2.8 per cent, respectively.
Although there was some modest recovery, the global economic conditions prevented annual growth from rising. The slump in domestic economic output has meant that many employers found it difficult to maintain employment at pre-crisis levels. The unemployment rate climbed to 11.6 per cent by the end of 2012, as over 5,500 Barbadians lost their jobs since 2008. This could have been horribly worse had government not taken the policy position to maintain employment levels in the public service.
Inflation reached a 20-year high of 9.5 per cent in 2011 as the pass-through effect of higher oil and food prices due to shortages brought on by drought conditions in the US pushed up prices at an annual average of 6.3 per cent during 2008 to 2012, well above the 1.7 per cent average recorded during 2000 to 2004.
But that is only half of the story Sir. I make these points to bring a level of seriousness and clarity to a debate that has gone on in the country seemingly oblivious to the very deep hole out of which this economy was being made to climb. And it was being asked to do this with an entirely unfavourable international economic environment and with an economy sorely lacking sustainable economic diversification and badly in need of restructuring.
While the real economy was feeling the direct impact of the international crisis, the secondary effects soon began to show up in our fiscal accounts. In our first year in office, tax revenue growth slowed to about one-third of what it had been during the previous five years. Those revenues which are driven mainly by economic activity – VAT, corporate and trade taxes – were most affected. This meant that our 2008/09 deficit was worse than the previous year by nearly $140 million – just over one and a half per cent of GDP.
By the next year, revenues collapsed – together, VAT, corporate and import-related tax receipts fell by over $200M, equivalent to 10 per cent of government’s overall income. The deficit widened even further and the pace of public debt accumulation accelerated. Even in spite of all of these challenges Sir, the one area in which we were able to hold together behind a robust external current account management policy was our international reserves. Indeed despite the lower than anticipated outturn of the traded sectors, the stock of foreign reserves increased from $1,359 million to $1,464.3 million, resulting in an increase of the import cover from 16.4 weeks in 2008 to 19.5 weeks at the end of 2012.
Even in the face of declining tourism earnings, a significant fall-off in private FDI flows and increasing energy prices, the reserves were maintained through Government’s fiscal strategies. It was on this platform that relative stability was being maintained in the local economy and which permitted us up until now to adopt a more gradual approach to fiscal adjustment and medium term economic restructuring. All of that changed significantly from around April this year (just after the General Election) when we began to see a very serious slide in our net international reserves. Now some have argued Sir, that our approach was incorrect, and that we ought to have gone more heavily with the fiscal adjustment particularly on the expenditure side and imposed drastic cuts at the beginning of the crisis.
We argued differently, since we believed then that such measures were not necessary if the foreign exchange anchor was not in immediate danger and to have done so would have driven an already depressed economy even further down. It is why we also did not believe that attempting to go to the other extreme of trying to spur growth by putting consumer spending on steroids was sustainable because in a depressed foreign exchange earning environment it would have placed our international reserves under tremendous pressure long before now. To be sure, one only wonders where we would have been today had we adopted that policy wholesale.
But Sir, all of this unfortunate economic news, even with the best of wills, was bound to undermine fiscal stability if it continued for an extended period of time. Unfortunately for us it has. As a government, we were faced with two simultaneous challenges: the imperative to rein in these growing fiscal imbalances and a duty to provide a cushion for the most vulnerable during the crisis.
We committed ourselves to maintaining employment in the Civil Service, while at the same time systematically adjusting our tax structure in a way that would not place an undue burden on any one group. Sir it is not a policy of which this government is ashamed. We believe we did the right thing in the prevailing circumstances. In the Budget of late 2010, recognising a weakened fiscal position and the implications this would have had on our efforts to have an early restoration of growth, we introduced a series of revenue raising and expenditure control measures aimed at consolidating the fiscal deficit in line with the objectives of the government’s Medium Term Fiscal Strategy which called for a balanced Budget by 2015/16.
In 2011 we began to see some progress: real GDP grew by close to one per cent, tax revenues improved by nearly 10.0 per cent and our deficit, as a percentage of GDP, was almost cut in half. Unfortunately, as I noted, the modest improvements we saw in 2010 and 2011 didn’t produce the momentum necessary to propel the economy as recovery in the US was sluggish and new fiscal crises emerged across the Euro-zone economies. As a result, by the 2012 fiscal year, our GDP growth had stalled. The targets under the MTFS, which had been crafted two years earlier against much more optimistic international forecasts, were now largely unattainable given the prevailing economic conditions and, despite our continued efforts, the fiscal deficit widened beyond these objectives as revenues continued their rapid deterioration.
Given some success at the end of the financial year 2011/2012 in reducing the fiscal deficit to 4.4 per cent of GDP, the outcome for 2012/2013 was a disappointing one as the gains made previously were eroded. The salient point to be made here Sir is that with the best will in the world, when an economy such as ours suffered such dramatic losses in revenue as we did in 2009-2010 by over 200 million dollars, making up that ground will always be exceedingly challenging especially if main growth sectors are being severally impacting upon by a negative international economic environment. However even in the midst of all this our net international reserves still ended the year 2012 in a relatively strong position at 1.4 billion dollars or approximately 19 weeks of import cover.
In fact Sir, even with a weak tourism winter season, up until the close of the first quarter of this year the monetary authorities were reporting that they were only required to expend US17 million dollars of the net reserves since our inflows pretty much matched our outflows. So than when we were reporting all of last year and up until March of this year that the stability which the foreign exchange anchor was providing to the economy was largely intact, that Sir, was a fact.
Since April of this year however, in the immediate post-election period, that scenario has changed dramatically and when coupled with a deteriorating fiscal situation carried forward from the last fiscal year, left unattended it will portend very dangerous consequences for our local economy. It is to these issues that I will now turn my attention. In doing so Sir, it is incumbent on me to lay out the facts as they relate to the current state of our economy based on the latest data we have at our disposal from the relevant authorities. Let us first get a general overview of the financial statement for the fiscal year 2012/13 and for the first three months of the current fiscal year.
Fiscal Performance April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013
Current Revenue: Information received from the Accountant General indicates that current revenue for the period April 1st, 2012 to March 30th, 2013 was $2,320.4 million, a decrease of $203.8 million or 0.8% from the amount recorded for the corresponding period during 2011/12. The $2,320.4 million was also $299.7 million less than the amount budgeted.
Taxes on incomes and profits realised $689.7 million, an amount of $82.5 million or 10.6% less than collected for the corresponding period in 2012 and $129.9 million less than budgeted. Corporation Taxes decreased by $24.6 million for the period under review. Refunds of corporation taxes for the period April 2012 to March 2013 was $9.8 million as compared with $20.8 million for the corresponding period last financial year. With respect to income taxes, $73.4 million less was recorded for the period April 2012 to March 2013.
It should be noted that refunds of income taxes were $103.1 million for the period under review while they were $104.2 million for the corresponding period in 2011-2012. Withholding taxes increased by $15.5 million over the corresponding period in 2012. Taxes on property increased by $4.9 million over the corresponding period in 2011-2012 to $138.6 million. This amount was also less than the amount budgeted by $8.1 million. Taxes on goods and services decreased by $76.1 million or 14.8% to $1,136.6 million. The amount was $112.5 million less than budgeted.
Receipts of VAT totalled $878.2 million, a decrease of $61.6 million over the corresponding period in 2012-2013. VAT refunds for the period under review were $53.2 million compared to $27.7 million in the corresponding period last financial year. Excise Duties recorded $149.5 million, a decrease of $11.3 million from the actual outturn for 2012. Import duties increased by $2.5 million to $198.1 million. However, this amount is $13.9 million less than budgeted. Special Receipts decreased by $46.6 million to $23.5 million. This is due to an accounting adjustment relating to the prior year with respect to transfers to the UWI. Non-Tax Revenue recorded $90.7 million, an amount of $21.3 million less than the corresponding period in 2012.
Expenditure: Current expenditure (exclusive of amortization of $540.7 million) decreased by $78.7 million or 2.8% from the 2012 figure, to $2,895.2 million. Wages and Salaries increased from $804.3 million in the corresponding period of 2012 to $807.1 million due mainly to increments. It should be noted that the amount budgeted for wages and salaries was $818.6 million.
Expenditure on goods and services decreased by $7.7 million to $391.8 million. This was $41.0 million less than budgeted. Expenditure on current transfers increased by $51.2 million, moving from $1,022.4 million in 2012 to $1,073.6 million for the period April 2012 to March 2013. The increase was due mainly to higher transfers of $22.6 million to Public Institutions and an increase in Other Benefits of $25.6 million. Total debt payments in the period April 2012 to March 2013 amounted to $1,100.2 million with interest payments of $559.5 million and amortization payments of $540.7 million. Interest payments and amortisation increased by $32.3 million and $86.0 million respectively over the corresponding period in 2012. The increase in amortisation can be attributed to the redemption of a $100 million bond in May 2012. It should be noted that the total debt payments for the period were $26.4 million less than originally budgeted.
Capital expenditure for the period under review was $93.7 million compared to $91.9 million for the corresponding period in 2012. Capital formation increased by $7.5 million and capital transfers decreased by $6.3 million. Total expenditure for April 2012 to March 2013 was $3,529.6 million compared to $3,363.0 million in the corresponding period of 2012.
The deficit of $668.5 million represents 7.9% of GDP at market prices. This deficit was higher than the 4.4% of GDP originally projected mainly due to the under-performance of revenue. The deficit for the corresponding period in 2012 was $384.2 million representing 4.4% of GDP at market prices.
Fiscal performance April 1 to June 30, 2013 Current Revenue:
Preliminary information received from the Accountant General indicates that current revenue for the period April 1st to June 30th, 2013 was $483.9 million, a decrease of $91.8 million or 15.6% from the amount recorded for the corresponding period during 2012. The $483.8 million collected is also $162.7 million less than originally budgeted.
Taxes on incomes and profits realised $149.0 million, an amount of $36.0 million or 19.5% less than collected for the corresponding period in 2012. This amount is also $56.1 million less than the original target. Corporation Taxes decreased by $32.0 million for the period under review. Refunds of corporation taxes for the period April to June 2013 was $1.25 million whereas there were no refunds for the corresponding period last financial year. With respect to income taxes, $13.3 million less was recorded for the period April to June 2013. It should be noted that refunds of income taxes were $26.9 million for the period under review while they were $36.6 million for the corresponding period in 2012-2013 Withholding taxes increased by $9.3 million over the corresponding period in 2012.
Taxes on property decreased by $2.4 million over the corresponding period in 2012-2013 to $5.2 million. Taxes on goods and services decreased by $44.3 million or 14.8% to $255.6 million. This is also $72.0 million less than originally targeted. Receipts of VAT totalled $200.9 million, a decrease of $29.4 million over the corresponding period in 2012-2013. VAT refunds for the period under review were $16.7 million compared to $9.8 million in the corresponding period last financial year. Excise Duties recorded $26.8 million, a decrease of $12.7 million from the actual outturn for 2012. Import duties decreased by $1.4 million to $44.6 million.
This represented a decrease of 3.0% from the amount collected in 2012. Special Receipts increased by $3.6 million to $9.1 million. This is due to an increase of $3.9 million in the Training Levy. Non-Tax Revenue recorded $17.9 million, an amount of $10.0 million less than the corresponding period in 2012. In May 2012, an amount of $12.5 million in property income was received as a BNOCL dividend.
Current expenditure, exclusive of amortization of $102.2 million, decreased by $17.7 million or 2.6% from the 2012 figure to $672.3 million. Wages and Salaries increased from $200.4 million in the corresponding period of 2012 to $202.7 million. However, this is $2.0 million less than targeted. Expenditure on goods and services increased by $2.7 million to $74.0 million. Expenditure on current transfers decreased, moving from $218.8 million in 2012 to $208.7 million for the period April to June 2013. This is $7.0 million less than the amount originally targeted. Total debt payments in the period April to June 2013 amounted to $272.9 million with interest payments of $170.7 million and amortization payments of $102.2 million. Interest payments and amortisation decreased by $13.0 million and $86.9 million respectively over the corresponding period in 2012. Capital expenditure for the period under review was $15.7 million compared to $12.3 million for the corresponding period in 2012.
Capital formation increased by $1.5 million and capital transfers increased by $1.6 million. Total expenditure for April to June 2013 was $790.1 million compared to $891.4 million in the corresponding period of 2012.
The deficit of $204.1 million represents 2.3% of GDP at market prices of $8,811.8 million. The deficit for the corresponding period in 2012 was $126.6 million representing 1.4% of GDP at market prices of $9,292.7 million.
Six months Economic Review 2013
Mr. Speaker Sir, colleagues, these public finance figures, particularly the negative outturn on revenue side continue to be driven in large measure by a weakened performance in real economic activity. This as we know began in the latter part of 2012 behind a softening in demand for goods and services abroad and deceleration in output in the domestic non-traded sectors.
Following a flat 2012, according to the latest six-month review done by the Central Bank of Barbados, there was contraction in all the main foreign exchange earning sectors, while private capital inflows were less than the previous period. Some of the major highlights of the recent domestic economic performance were as follows:
Against the backdrop of these realities Mr. Speaker, and ever mindful of the fact that the global economy is unlikely, especially among our key trading partners, to rebound robustly over the next 12 to 18 months, it is now absolutely necessary for government to intervene to procure some very specific objectives in the short to medium term. These can be listed as follows:
Our diagnostic analysis leads us to conclude that, if left alone, macro-economic instability will set in and take root behind a further deterioration of the public finances through much higher deficit than last year, an increase in the public debt to GDP ratio with the accompanying unsustainable increases in debt service costs, and a continuation of the precipitous and dangerous decline in the country’s net international reserves.
Based on Ministry of Finance and Central Bank analyses, on current trajectory the fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP, if left alone, will likely end the current fiscal year somewhere between 8 and 9 per cent. This is based on an expected moderate increase in expenditure, through supplementary requests and a continued rapid fall off in revenues as economic activity continues to contract over the next six months.
Equally, on current pace we are also predicting that, without intervention to stem the decline, the net international reserves are likely to close the year just below the billion dollar mark or roughly around the international minimum standard of 12.5 weeks of import cover. Neither of these scenarios portends any favourable circumstances for Barbados or Barbadians. In this regard therefore it is absolutely necessary that government intervenes now to alter the trajectory of the macro-fundamentals.
While we are still investigating from an empirical perspective what has been driving such a steep drain on our international reserves, preliminary evidence has hinted that it cannot be substantially explained by a leakage of foreign exchange through increased imports or other similar transactions. Yes, we have had a soft tourism earnings season and Foreign Direct Investment has been below 2012 levels somewhat, but neither these, nor indeed our outlays for external debt payments, have behaved in a hugely abnormal fashion.
In this case therefore we have been surmising that the usual flows of foreign exchange are not making it into the system and that this is working as a drain factor on the reserves as more and more demands are placed on the Central Bank to meet daily requirements.
If this is indeed the case, and noting the loss of over 300 million dollars in reserves in just over three months, it would be reasonable to deduce that much of this could be attributed to a decline in the level of overall confidence in our economy by foreign and domestic investors alike.
Given this Sir, the prolongation of the international downturn, the persistently high budget deficits of the government and its unsustainable debt levels, together with the sluggish growth figures can be highlighted as the chief contributors to this apparent declining confidence.
One of the good things that we have developed over the course of this period of economic turbulence is an internal economic management and review system that meets on a regular basis not only to assess the country’s economic performance but to shape policies which can directly respond to challenges when they arise.
It is through this mechanism that from as early as March this year when we started to see the unusual foreign exchange movement that I instructed the Division of Economic Affairs and Planning, to work with the Central Bank and the Finance Division to craft a new growth and development strategy with a stronger fiscal adjustment component and a medium term restructuring programme for the non-financial public service (or statutory entities).
Indeed Sir, immediately following the passage of the Annual Estimates in this Honourable Chamber, my team set to work to craft the Draft Medium-Term Growth and Development Strategy which benefitted richly not only from the input of several ministries and government statutory entities but from vibrant contributions from the private sector and the labour movement.
In June of this year the initial draft document was released for public consumption as the Prime Minister hosted a National Consultation on the Economy with a wide cross-section of institutional, sectoral and individual interests. That consultation was followed in the weeks thereafter with the ministry hosting separate caucuses with key players and stakeholders across the economy not only on the specifics of the strategy but on the challenges facing our economy and likely interventions by government. This extensive process of consultation concluded with a full meeting of the Sub-Committee of the Social Partnership where again both the strategy and many of its recommendations came under close scrutiny as to their practicality and appropriateness.
And, Mr. Speaker, following more internal review and consultations, we are happy to report to this Parliament and the country as a whole that Cabinet has approved laying in this House the new Growth and Development Strategy for Barbados.
This growth and development strategy 2013-2020 charts a clear direction for our sustainable green economic growth and development priorities over the next eight years. It defines government’s plan to institute a sequence of managed structural adjustments and reforms which are critical to the country’s sustainable economic, human and social development over the planning horizon 2013-2020.
The theme of Barbados’ Growth and Development Strategy (BGDS) 2013-2020 is “Adjustment, Reform, Recovery and Sustainability”. Immediate adjustment is needed to reduce the fiscal deficit and the debt-to-GDP ratio to more sustainable levels, while growing foreign reserves. Reform speaks to the necessary policies, programmes and institutions which must be implemented in the short to medium-term in order to strengthen Barbados’ economic and social fundamentals.
The positive economic impacts of the adjustment and reform activities will facilitate our recovery and return to a trajectory of economic growth. The strategy proposes that growth should be managed on the basis of annual targets set by the Social Partnership, with the progress and achievement of the aforementioned targets being closely monitored and controlled.
Sustainability of our economic growth and development over the 2013-2020 period will be assured through this nation’s commitment to productivity, efficiency, competitiveness and service excellence. The policies, strategies and projects outlined in the BGDS 2013 -2020 require us all, to share in the burden of fiscal adjustment, structural reform and the restoration of growth and sustainability. However, even as we make this transition to new circumstances, we must ensure that we take strategic advantage of the opportunities that will arise to aid us in continuing to protect the poorest, indigent and most vulnerable members of our society.
Mr. Speaker, I commend this document to the country, firm in the belief that if as government, private sector, labour and the wider public we work assiduously to implement its recommendations we will see a turnaround in economic circumstances.
Unlike our previous Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy we have not worked on the assumption that global economic growth and recovery will be robust. In fact, to the contrary, we start from the opposite view that low growth and anaemic demand for our goods and services internationally will likely continue well into the planning period.
To this extent, we have settled on the firm view that until global growth and recovery is evident, a major eighteen-month programme of fiscal adjustments and specific growth initiatives will have to be implemented to pull our economy around, stabilize and grow the international reserves, and create new jobs through major private and public investments. It is to this programme, and the specific initiatives underpinning it, that I now turn my attention. For ease of reference Mr. Speaker, I propose to speak first to the growth initiatives, then to the fiscal adjustment policies and finally to the public sector reforms which government is contemplating.
Mr. Speaker, it is an indisputable reality that the surest way for any country to pull itself out of any economic slump is to grow the economy consistently and at sustainable rates. The growth segment of this Medium Term Growth and Development Strategy 2013-2020 seeks to consolidate and strengthen the existing growth areas while building on the creation of new growth areas. The broad objective going forward is to return the Barbadian economy towards the achievement of a sustainable growth rate of 3.0 percent by 2017 and 4.5 percent by 2020. The key pillars towards the realisation of this growth will be those that are private-sector led, productivity-enhancing, export and investment focussed, employment-generating, socially balanced, and supportive of green growth and environmental sustainable development.
Growth will eventually be buttressed by the expected recovery in major external markets (the USA and UK are forecast to grow by 3.3 percent and 2.7 percent respectively).
However, in the short to medium-term from the government side of the equation a more aggressive intervention for growth will have to be undertaken. This effort will be constructed around what we call the four drivers of growth:
1. Increased public and private, foreign and domestic investment
2. Better business facilitation
3. Increased Productivity
4. Increased competitiveness whether on price or quality of product/service
In this respect we propose the following measures and programmes as an all-inclusive initiative over the next 18 months to push smart marketing and planning strategies to facilitate stronger tourism demand and international business and financial services. Greater effort will be made at finding new tourism markets and special activities in agriculture and manufacturing, while also pushing renewable energy to help in the achievement of the targeted growth projections. Construction will also be a main driver being sponsored by an accelerated public and private sector investment programme.
Tourism and Related Services:
The NIS will assist with the financing of the expansion of the Industrial Credit Fund by periodically depositing surplus funds (at reasonable rates of interest) with the Fund. This approach seeks to spur much needed financing to the sector but minimize the risk to the NIS and address a number of incentive problems. The entities will remain under full private sector management: the disbursement of funds will be subject to the rigour of the credit assessment of private financial institutions and critically the debts will be due to private financial institutions and not to the State entities. Loans will be given at highly reduced rates with an appropriate moratorium on repayments of principal and interest while government will offer a special duty and tax waiver programme for any property owner accessing the initiative over the 18 months. The Central Bank has already provided public information on the expansion of the Industrial Credit Fund and Credit Guarantee Scheme.
This initiative is being targeted specially at the major problem we currently have of declining quality of our existing room stock in operation. The aim is to see a major improvement in the quality of rooms and amenities of not less than 75 percent of those properties in need of improvement.
Additionally, it is our hope that, following the sale of the Four Seasons Project to a preferred international investor, work on that site will finally begin, during the course of next year. Requests for proposals to this effect have already been posted in local and international media and proposals are already streaming in. We expect a selection to be made during October 2013.
Additional Tourism Support Measures:
As you are aware Sir, the Honourable Minister of Tourism last month outlined a ten-point plan to assist with the short-term recovery of the sector. These measures ranged from assistance with marketing of up-scale accommodation plant on the island as part of the accommodation pool in Barbados, to support with dampening the impact of the APD, as well as reducing the cost of energy to local properties.
In an effort to continue in this vein of reducing overhead costs in the sector and putting it on a more competitive footing vis-à-vis its competitors, I now propose that effective October 1, 2013, the new VAT rate on accommodation in the hotel sector will be 7.5 percent. Additionally from that same date Direct Tourism Services will be brought in line with their accommodation counterparts at 7.5 percent down from the current rate of 17.5 percent. This should cost the Treasury approximately 9 million dollars a year.
There has been a longstanding request from hoteliers for a slate of items, including some agricultural products imported under WTO bound rates to be removed from such or have them significantly reduced. My ministry, working in concert with other relevant ministries, is still conducting investigations into the potential impact such requests will have on local producers and indeed the jobs which they generate. This evening I give the sector the assurance that in the next six months my ministry will have word on which items we propose to address and which will remain protected.
In the main time however, we have gathered sufficient intelligence to allow us announce that effect 1st September the bound duty rate on heavy cream, a supply used across the sector can safely be reduced in line with the common external tariff rate of 40% observed by CARICOM for external goods.
With these measures in place and some luck for a more robust recovery among our key trading partners I see no reason why this sector should not be able to rebound in the short to medium-term. However, we shall take no chances and, following a request from the BHTA, with advice from the Minister of Tourism, I have agreed to sit with them and other major stakeholders in the industry at least once a quarter to review our progress and make alternative plans if necessary.
International Business and Financial Services Sector:
Sir, another of our key sectors which will come in for very special scrutiny is the IBFS sector. I don’t have to remind the House how critical the success of this sector is to the Barbados economy and society generally. However of course over the last decade the sector has come in for a major battering as it tries to defend itself against accusations of being a tax haven. From the OECD Peer Review process to FACTA and now a mis-interpretation of Barbadian Law by Canadian Revenue Officials as it relates the proper designation of off-shore banks and their regulation, the environment has been quite hostile.
We ourselves have not exactly made it much better by ignoring several of the low-hanging fruit which could make the facilitation of international business and investment in Barbados easier and more flexible. It is time to change that equation. In this regard I am empowered by the Cabinet of Barbados to announce the following:
1. Regulations to accompany the International Corporate and Trust Provider Act are ready and will be laid in Parliament in October when the House returns from summer recess.
2. Starting from January 1st, 2014 the International Business Unit will be empowered to issue international business companies with multi-year licenses for up to three years. This will eliminate the requirement for company principals to endure the headache of having to apply each year for licenses and the sometimes inordinate waiting periods.
3. The Ministry of Finance will instruct the Inland Revenue Department to procure on a consultancy basis a local company and tax law expert to handle tax law resolution issues and provide advice to the department so that timely decisions could be handed to businesses in the sector that require them. BIBA has generously agreed to work with the ministry to put this initiative into effect ASAP. 4. From budget year 2014 the Ministry of Finance will increase the marketing and investment promotion budget of Invest Barbados by an additional 7 million dollars to beef up its presence in the FDI market.
5. Last year I would have announced the coming into force of a Special Entry Initiative for high net-worth individuals. The policy is already in existence and being applied in respect of special-entry permits for high net-worth individuals. These permits provide such persons with the opportunity to visit Barbados whenever they wish, to stay as long as the permit is valid, and to establish tax residency in Barbados. All three of these activities contribute to strengthening Barbados’ attractiveness as an international business domicile.
Applicants for such permits are required to supply police certificates of character as for immigrant status applications, evidence of net worth and evidence of currently valid health insurance as part of the application process. For high net worth individuals, the net worth of the applicant must exceed US$5 million. There has also been substantial interest by foreigners who have bought high valued properties here, or who are interested in buying such properties, to have Special Entry/Residence Permits for five years.
At present foreigners who own property here are often given permission to enter the country for periods shorter than they would like, despite their clear ability to sustain themselves while on the island for the periods requested. Despite instructions to the contrary the entry periods permitted to such property owners have continued to be inconsistently given. As a result these visitors have then to apply at the Bridgetown Office of the Immigration Department for extensions of stay. Thus the ability of these visitors to stay for the periods of time they wish and can afford has been rendered subject to unnecessary bureaucracy in a Department that is already finding it difficult to manage the large number of applications it has to handle.
Therefore effective from 1st September 2013 a Special Entry Permit valid for five years at a time will be available to foreigners who own substantial residential property or investment in Barbados. Investment would include rental real estate, property development projects, manufacturing, tourism, bank deposits, mutual funds or bonds or any financial instrument. The value of the property or investment to be used to qualify an applicant for Special Entry Permit status should be US$2 million or more and the investment must have been purchased with funds sourced outside Barbados and not be subject to any mortgage on it.
As with High Net Worth Individuals, foreigners who make such investments in Barbados and seek Special Entry Permits must meet the criteria of a clean police certificate of character and valid health insurance.
Thirdly, foreigners who have special skills needed in the country as determined by the Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Human Resource Development, acting in concert with the respective Ministries with oversight of the sectors where the special skills are to be employed, and who wish to live in Barbados will also be eligible for Special Entry Permits.
The fees for the two new categories of Special Entry permits will be the same as those for Special Entry Permits for High Net Worth Individuals. The spouse of a person who has been granted a Special Entry Permit will be entitled to a special entry permit on payment of the fee for a Special Entry Permit, while their dependants of minor age given student visa status for the life of the Special Entry Permit, on payment of the application processing fee.
All persons who hold Special Entry Permits will be issued with a Barbados Identification card, as is done for work permit holders, suitably coded to identify their status so that they will be able to obtain Barbados drivers’ licenses and otherwise conduct business in Barbados.
These Special Entry Permits will all be renamed Special Entry and Reside Permits.
To this extent, and following consideration of several requests from the private sector on this matter, I am happy to announce that the Cabinet has agreed to the recommendation that a National Business Facilitation Unit be created within the Ministry of International Business, Trade, Industry and Small Business Development. This small unit will be staff from among existing officers of the ministry and will be headed by an Investment Commissioner who will be responsible for assisting with the smooth and efficient implementation of prospective investments, both local and foreign, in Barbados. The Commissioner will report directly to the Cabinet through the Cabinet Committee on Economic Policy.
Agriculture Major Agriculture Reform:
In the area of agriculture our principal focus in the next eighteen months, Sir, will be the initiation of the major restructuring of the local sugar cane industry. As is well known, this industry has been on a steady and sure decline for many years now, having suffered not only from a dismantling of the preferential arrangements with Europe but also because of serious internal challenges relating to financing and excess cost over the ability to earn.
And in the face of a failure by the authorities to do a serious restructuring of the industry it has now come to a juncture at which an ignominious collapse was awaiting. This administration has however designed, and successfully sought financing to advance, a major restructuring of the industry over the next three years, starting next year, in what is the Barbados Cane Industry Project.
Funding for this exercise (which will see the re-engineering of an existing sugar factory so as to allow it to engage multiple applications, including the production of bio-mass for the co-generation of electricity) has been agreed with the Japanese Bank of International Corporation and Japanese commercial banks for up to US270 million dollars.
Negotiations with all stakeholders including the workers’ representatives have already begun and the Ministry of Agriculture will be making a fuller pronouncement of the details of the project in the coming weeks.
It is expected that this project will begin implementation in the first quarter of next year and run for three full years. It will radically reform sugar agriculture while having very positive spin-off effects on non-sugar crop production.
With this process well on the way, it is government’s intention to forge ahead with other initiatives in the short term to give a boost to the local agriculture sector including the creation of a 2 million dollar grant initiative specifically for small farmers to engage in crop production. This initiative will be established and run by the BAS in consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture.
Secondly, my ministry in consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture and the BHTA, will be proposing a special programme to incentivise local hotels to use more local produce in their properties. At present when hoteliers and hotel developers seek concessions from the Ministry of Finance these are freely given to promote investment and assist in earning foreign exchange. This, for all intents and purposes, will continue well into the future. However it is the intention of my ministry to institute a policy that ties future requests for concessions and waivers by local hotels and restaurants to a demonstrable use of domestic produce and even manufactures.
As you are aware Sir, the local rum industry has in recent times come under significant pressure from US rum producers who are now the beneficiaries of illegal subsidies which are eroding the competitiveness of Barbados’ rum and consequently its market share. These so-called “cover-over” subsidies are now having a major negative impact to the extent where local and regional producers are being left with considerable stocks of rum which they cannot get the rid of.
Both at the level of CARICOM and domestically, governments across the region, including Barbados, have been petitioning the US government over the distortionary impact which these subsidies are having on the US market for rum. Indeed CARICOM is also preparing for the possibility of lodging a case in the WTO to have the offending subsidies removed.
As you could imagine Sir this is a process that could potentially take years to resolve while our local rum industry that brings in near US60 million dollars a year in foreign exchange could face certain collapse. Bearing all of these factors in mind and knowing that local officials are pressing for a negotiated settlement of the issue, we have determined that it has become necessary for us to act to safe guard the future of the industry.
To this extent government will, in the coming weeks, sit again with representatives from the local rum industry, this time to examine a mechanism that would initiate a similar level of subsidization for our local rum producers so that they can remain relevant and competitive in overseas markets. This sector is way too important for us to sit idly by and watch as it is destroyed before our very eyes. Further details of this initiative will be made public as they are agreed.
Additionally, in order to enable the local rum distillery industry to meet the challenge it now faces and is likely to encounter for the next several years, Government has instructed the Barbados National Oil Company Limited (BNOCL) to work closely and urgently with the local distilleries on the introduction of locally produced ethanol into the gasoline sold locally. At present, the BNOCL imports gasoline that has been blended with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE).
The quantityof MTBE blended into the gasoline imported by BNOCL amounts on average to 12 million litres per year and, in order to provide gasoline with a lower level of undesirable emissions, BNOCL aims to replace all of this MTBE by ethanol from the new sugar cane processing complex. The ethanol from this source will however not be ready for another three years or so, and the situation where the distilleries find themselves with surplus inventory of bulk rum because of the US subsidy to its own rum producers, will be turned into an opportunity to start the process of replacing MTBE by local ethanol at an earlier stage.
BNOCL and the distilleries will over the next few months have to work out the specifics of quality for the fuel grade ethanol BNOCL needs and the required alternate processing that the distilleries need to do, as well as any change in the specifications of the gasoline that BNOCL needs to import in order to accommodate the use of the available local ethanol without affecting the octane quality of the gasoline sold at the pump. Thus, Government will facilitate maintaining the size of the local distillery industry, and in the process save the country foreign exchange and provide a cleaner gasoline product.
Alternative Energy Sector:
In relation to the Alternative Energy Sector Sir, I am happy to announce that both the long-awaited Electric Light and Power Bill and the Income Tax Amendment Bill which relate to renewable energy concessions and incentives are ready for debate in Parliament, with the latter expected to be passed at the end of this week. In anticipation of these, government is forging ahead with the unveiling in the coming weeks of a major renewable energy initiative aimed at not only garnering energy cost savings for the government but also using some major government buildings to generate electricity from solar energy for “on sell” to the Barbados Light and Power.
The Cabinet will shortly be called upon to consider a proposal to invite the private sector to supply, erect, operate and maintain solar electricity systems on the roofs of selected Government-owned buildings using the modality of a Solar Power Purchase Agreement (SPPA). The electricity generated by these systems will be used by the Government and the excess sold to the Barbados Light and Power Co. Ltd. This novel Public Sector/Private Sector Partnership (PPP) arrangement is intended to advance the penetration of solar electricity systems in Barbados.
The Government considers that as many roofs as feasible in Barbados need to be turned into generators of electricity to the home, business or office. This would lead to the democratization of the generation of electricity from intermittent energy sources such as wind and solar so that every householder and business recognize their ability to contribute in a meaningful way to energy security and the reduction of the fuel import bill. The erection of solar electricity systems on the roofs of hurricane shelters is to be funded by a US$2 million grant. This effort is being purs