Full statement by Standard & Poor’s
The following is the full release issued by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services on its downgrade of Barbados’ long term sovereign credit rating.
Despite various adjustment efforts on both revenues and expenditures, Barbados’ fiscal accounts remain under pressure with ongoing large deficits, a high debt burden that continues to rise and narrower financing options.
GDP growth could turn a corner next year with increased investment in tourism projects but it is likely to remain low, limiting prospects for revenu growth.
We are lowering our long-term sovereign credit ratings on Barbados to ‘B’ from ‘BB-‘ and affirming our short-term ratings at ‘B’.
The negative outlook reflects the potential for a downgrade if recent measures fail to gradually stabilise the debt burden, if tourism investment projects fail to support a turnaround in growth or if external pressures mount.
On Dec. 19, 2014, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its long-term sovereign credit ratings on Barbados to ‘B’ from ‘BB-‘. The outlook is negative. We affirmed our ‘B’ short-term sovereign credit ratings. We also lowered the transfer and convertibility assessment to ‘B’ from ‘BB-‘.
The downgrade reflects continued large fiscal deficits, a high debt burden that continues to rise, and narrower financing options. Financing this larger deficit has become more difficult in both local and external capital markets, leading the government to rely on official and central bank financing, and some drawings on the sinking funds. The National Insurance Scheme’s (NIS) ability to finance the government is lower than in the past because of its declining surpluses. Financing from local banks is increasingly based on shorter tenures and higher interest rates.
The government aims to lower the central government deficit to six per cent to seven per cent of GDP by the end of March 2015 from 12.7 per cent of GDP in the previous fiscal year ended March 2014. The budget contains various fiscal adjustment measures, but much of the fiscal savings have yet to be realized.
A key portion of the planned adjustment depends on reducing budgetary supplementals – or requests for additional spending at fiscal year-end by public institutions -that takes place at the end of the year. We expect some slippage from official fiscal targets given the risks that much of the fiscal adjustment has not yet been executed. Moreover, the weak economy will weigh on revenue performance this year and next.
An additional deficit reduction next year relies on higher growth and maintaining current revenue measures, in addition to further steps to widen the tax base and other austerity measures at public institutions.
We expect the general government deficit, which incorporates NIS surpluses that we estimate at about 2.3 per cent of GDP in 2014, to decline to 5.6 per cent of GDP in fiscal 2014 toward five per cent of GDP in fiscal 2015, from 10.1 per cent in 2013. This decline reflects the government’s fiscal consolidation plan. However, risks remain from the sluggish outlook for the country’s main economic sectors, high unemployment, and potential spending pressures.
Standard & Poor’s expects the net general government debt burden to rise to 89 per cent of GDP in 2014 and 92 per cent in 2015 from 80 per cent in 2013 and 69 per cent in 2012. Barbados uses more than 15 per cent of general government revenues to pay interest on its debt (excluding the interest that the government pays on government debt, which the NIS holds).
Barbados has a stable, predictable, and mature political system, which has traditionally benefited from consensus on major economic and social issues. While there is support and acknowledgment of the need for adjustment, private-sector confidence in the government’s ability to deliver appears mixed. This reflects a delay in putting forth a comprehensive adjustment plan.
Sharp fiscal deterioration and a decline in international reserves in 2013 prompted the government to take corrective actions. In August and December 2013, the government announced a series of adjustment measures that included tax increases (for the municipal tax, bank assets tax, and consolidation tax) as well as expenditure cuts. About 3,000 public-sector employees, essentially at government agencies and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) were to be laid off.
Expenditure rationalization efforts centre on the agencies and SOEs because control over their finances has been lax. To staunch this pattern, the government established a Special Oversight Committee on SOEs in 2014 to monitor and control their spending. This committee complements monitoring by the Management Accounting Unit of the Ministry of Finance and receives monthly status reports from the agencies and SOEs. We view this as a positive development, but the key will be execution.
Barbados’ economic fundamentals remain weak, reflecting not only subdued global economic conditions, but also competitiveness and other structural shortcomings. Its narrow and open economy has continued to suffer since the 2008 global financial crisis. Real GDP growth declined on average 0.5 per cent per year during 2009-2013. This year, we expect the economy to decline marginally.
It was flat though the third quarter, with tourism arrivals up only marginally during the first 11 months of the year. Only tourism from the UK (more than
one-third of tourists) has showed strong growth. Given the fiscal adjustment, we expect a contraction for the year as a whole. Real GDP growth should pick up next year to 1.2 per cent and move toward two per cent in 2016-2017.
A reduction in airlift to Barbados earlier in 2014 has been corrected, and there are incipient signs of some pickup in tourism since October from the US and Canada.
While we expect investment in the tourism sector to pick up, there is some uncertainty about the timing and extent of new projects. The most concrete projects are two Sandals resorts, with the first set to open at the end of
January 2015 and the second property to close and undergo important refurbishing and construction for two years beginning late 2015. Tax concessions awarded to Sandals have been extended to other projects as well. A Hyatt hotel is set to start construction in early 2015. Other villa and high-end residence projects appear set to advance as well.
The negative outlook reflects the potential for a downgrade if the government doesn’t succeed in bringing down its wide fiscal deficit, if growth boosted by key investment projects fails to materialize, or if external pressures of persistent current account deficits mount. This scenario would likely lead to further deterioration in the availability of financing for large fiscal deficits. We could revise the outlook to stable if the government succeeds in reining in the deficit in line with its targets and maintains access to financing, especially from private creditors. This in turn would help improve government debt and interest burdens.