• Today
    August 20

  • 12:05 AM

Gun debate not about statistics


Added 10 October 2017


Every time a mass shooting horrifies America, gun control advocates trot out statistics and charts proving that more guns produce more violent deaths.

Then pro-gun people respond that the overall gun homicide rate has dropped 50 per cent since 1993, despite a boom in gun sales, and point to polls showing a decline in support for gun regulation. At such times, I am always reminded of the shampoo direction to “lather, rinse, repeat”.

Both sides of the gun debate are certain that the facts are on their side, and keep making the same arguments over and over to no effect. America is deadlocked on gun control because this debate is based more on first principles than evidence. People who oppose restrictions on firearms do so for instinctual and cultural reasons, and see gun ownership as a matter of personal liberty and safety.

Those who favour stronger gun laws believe statistics prove that fewer guns would result in fewer deaths, and that the ensuing reduction in gun deaths would outweigh any accompanying loss of liberty, recreation or psychological benefit.

But statistics don’t change people’s minds, especially when the subject is so emotional and deeply tied to cultural identity. To change the status quo, America needs to change how people FEEL about guns.



Dos and Donts

Welcome to our discussion forum here on nationnews.com. We encourage lively debate, but we also urge you to take note of the following:

  • Stay on topic – This helps keep the thread focused on the discussion at hand. If you would like to discuss another topic, look for a relevant article.
  • Be respectful – Meeting differences of opinion with civil discussion encourages multiple perspectives and a positive commenting environment.
  • Do not type in capitals – In addition to being considered “shouting” it is also difficult to read.
  • All comments will be moderated – Given the volume of comments each day, this may take some time. So please be patient.
  • We reserve the right to remove comments – Comments that we find to be abusive, spam, libellous, hateful, off-topic or harassing may be removed.
  • Reproduction of comments – Some of your comments may be reproduced on the website or in our daily newspapers. We will use the handle, not your email address.
  • Do not advertise – Please contact our Advertising Department.
  • Contact our Online Editor if you have questions or concerns.
  • Read our full Commenting Policy and Terms of Use.
comments powered by Disqus


Do you think that marijuana should be legalised only for medical and scientific purposes?